all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 years ago

Also maybe the use of AI made text? It's easier to produce papers faster.

Funny : this article looks like an AI made article. It's long compared to the actual information it provides.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Hilariously enough, the co-author quoted in this article co-authored over 70 papers in 2023. That's well above the 60 paper/year metric they are using to determine what qualifies as "extremely productive".

    While I agree that academia puts far too much emphasis on quantity of publications rather than quality, this is a mind-numbing level of hypocrisy.

  • source