all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

The lawsuit said, “AI companies pay Brave to provide them with real-time online content from the Brave search index,” and use content from the Brave index “to train their own AI models” and “to respond to specific user queries.” The NYT lawsuit points to Brave’s website, which says the Brave Search API is “used by some of the biggest names in AI, including Cohere, Mistral, Perplexity, and You.com.”

The browser “blocks advertising that would otherwise appear on The Times’s website, and instead shows its own ads, offering its users a cut of the revenue even as it deprives The Times of digital advertising revenue that helps it fund the expensive effort of producing journalism,” the lawsuit said.

If this is true, this is so scummy. I'm all for paywall blocking for people, but taking away profits from news sites and turn it into profits for your company is a new low.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 31 minutes ago

    effort of producing journalism

    I don't think this has been true of the nyt for some years.

    Between a "privacy" browser that steals ads and trains ai on the one hand, and a declining mouthpiece for elites with pretensions of journalism on the other, it's hard to work out who to oppose more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 30 minutes ago (1 child)

    I’ve had pretty good results using unwall.app/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    I wonder if this goes to court and if the DMCA will be invoked.

  • source