Doctors are apprehensive about letting young people get sterilised. The problem is that I'm heavily disabled and would feel gender dysphoria with pregnancy.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

I was "denied" sterilisation first attempt and talked into IUD, but the second attempt five years later I got one. They tried to sell me on IUD again but a thing I learned during that time was to stand up for myself and insist on receiving the care and treatments I want, so it's possible I could have insisted on it the first time around as well.

It's also possible I had an easier time getting through to them simply because I had listened to their advice the first time around and still wasn't content with it after five years, and I had turned over 26 years old.

A hormonal IUD or implant in your arm can help with gender dysphoria in two ways: prevent pregnancy AND prevent menstruation (if one doesn't work for bleeding the other likely will).

The IUD can be rough to put in and remove as its a gynecological, which can be both dysphoric and very painful (if you can get sedated or nitrous gas for it I highly recommend it!), but it only needs replacing every five years (can be removed/replaced during sterilisation or similar surgeries) and you shouldn't feel it's there at all, so no dysphoria trigger once it's in.

The arm implant is easier to insert as it's a doctor visit with no nudity required, but with a BIG fucking needle, and you need to replace it more frequently, and you can see it move and feel where it is when you touch the skin on your bicep. It's still not directly connected to genitalia so hopefully wouldn't trigger dysphoria every time you notice it, but that's a personal case.

It may be possible you can insist and get sterilised even at a young age. But if you are not already on hormones that prevent menstruation, the IUD or implant might even be a better option for you as it does two thing at once, and you don't have to remember a daily pill. I went back to IUD some years after sterilisation just to get rid of my periods, as sterilisation doesn't affect menstruation at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Surely it depends what form you get sterilised? Tubes tying wouldn't prevent menstruation, but a hysterectomy would, as it removes the ovaries (but then you'd certainly need to be on HRT - but if you're trans anyway, that might not be an issue)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago*

    That true, but the OP said bisalp which, unless I mistranslated, doesn't remove the ovaries.

    And I generally interpret "sterilisation" to mean tubal for the following reasons: When removing ovaries or uterus the main reason isn't usually sterilisation, that's more like a side effect. If the main reason is preventing cancer and the chosen method for that is hysterectomy, it would also have a sterilisation effect, but I wouldn't call the operation a "sterilisation" because that isn't the point of it, you know? And if the point is to do a sterilisation you wouldn't usually go for a hysterectomy, because tubal interventions have much easier operations and much fewer side effects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago

    Norplant or IUD are some longer term options for birth control

  • source