Producing a correct answer doesn't imply comprehension, using the word "solve" doesn't imply comprehension. Computers have been "solving" math problems for decades.

There is no attribution of comprehension implied in that phrase.

Stop attributing comprehension and agency

That's not what this is doing. At all. It's saying it produced a solution.

Edit: Y'all, mathematicians literally use deterministic algorithms called SAT solvers that solve the Boolean satisfiability problem. Saying an algorithm "solved" a math problem is not ascribing it comprehension or agency.

Search bots that have ingested speech patterns. Psycholinguistics is traceable down to codons, sure, but the meaning and nuance is lost. Lewis Carroll is probably LLM kryptonite, for example.

AI is a PR pick for a name. A name to lure in investors. It attributes so much more to the bots and invokes curiosity in everyone around it. Versus language bot or some other not so sexy name.

Also answers are much much much less interesting than the steps to the solution and reasoning, which can be applied to future problems

The goal, fully articulated or not, is to make it so easy to bypass the journey and the education that people loose the ability to do that part. Kill the need for educated and skilled people so everyone switches to AI and can’t switch back because the people that can do the work no longer exist. Always remember too that these tech guys look at the worst parts of sci-fi, fail to understand the moral of the story, and unironically think it’s the best goal.

Probably from the university (CUNEF) themselves, given that they're private.