I was commenting on a post just now, and I needed to find a source for it where I had to pick through websites I didn't recognize. Eventually I found something affiliated with BBC science, which may have its own issues but it's a whole lot more reputable than the slop. However, if I was a younger user or new to a topic, I wouldn't have known to use that source.

At first I was thinking of making a community for this, but I don't think we will have enough content to sustain a single purpose community like this.

Instead, I'm making this post to encourage people to post those questions to existing communities.

Please suggest where someone should make such posts. So far I'm thinking:

Long term it would be nice to have a blacklist of these on UBO.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Curated directories should make a comeback.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    They quickly become deluged by spam entries. That's why they disappeared/stopped being updated in the 90s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    There was always that battle with useless commercial listings, but that's not how I remember the end of dmoz. I remember Google (and other search engines to a lesser extent) just getting way too good at the time. There was also a content explosion around that era making directories just get too large, too slow to update, and difficult to use and manage.

    But I still wonder if some (maybe niche) directories could work these days with the degeneration of search engines and AI slop. Actual humans curating links to useful information created or compiled by other humans sounds oddly refreshing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    i remember a time of webrings - homebrewn websites had a list of links to other homebrewn or at least reputable websites. This was before search engines were a thing. Also books with recommended addresses. ,

    nowadays i often check 'awesome lists'. They are usually quite useful. (inclined reader may look up by themselves. Am lazy)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Your link was mangled, plus, they linked the top level list at the bottom of the page: https://github.com/erichs/awesome-awesome

    This one isn’t on that list but is also very packed with good content: https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 days ago

    I can feel the web rings rising from the shea of history. Their time has come one again!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    You're looking for https://bubbles.town/

    There's other curated directories popping up, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    That TLD doesn't inspire confidence.

    .org isn't it what it used to be, so are .ac/.edu a better bet when you don't know much about a topic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Reputation markets, where a circle of people I trust can maintain a whitelist of people and sites they trust

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments