top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 5 hours ago

Ok you got me with this one.

Btw the mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago

    In Windows land, it's HANDLEs...which is typedef void* HANDLE IIRC

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 44 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

    It makes more sense when you realize that it's not that everything is files it's that everything can be treated as a file. There are other APIs to interact with things, but everything can be interacted with as if it was a file. It doesn't seem as bonkers like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    Files don't actually exist once you dig down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it sort of depends on the definition of the word file. "File" in the sense that it can be interacted with like a file versus "file" in the sense that it's data on a disk. But then, if you're really thinking about it, data on a disk isn't a file, it's data, and we can just interact with it like a file.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 13 hours ago* (2 children)

    Exactly. A file is really just a way to understand a collection of bits. So saying everything is files is like saying everything in computers can be described as sets of bits, which is not a terrible heuristic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (32 children)

    Stages of POSIX enlightenment:

    1. It couldn't possibly all be files
    2. It's all files
    3. What is a file, anyway?
    4. There's no such thing as a file
    5. It couldn't possibly all be files
    6. Everything is a file

    Most people stop at stage 2, stage 3 hits when you decide to write a filesystem, stage 4 when you've finished your first filesystem. Stage 5 is when you start working on kernel internals. No one can tell you how to reach stage 6, you must discover it for yourself.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 23 hours ago* (8 children)

    /dev/null sez nothing is also a file

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

    Asking for a friend.

    If you can recognize "nothing" then "nothing" must be something right? So if nothing is a file, because /dev/null says so, then nothing MUST be something to be a file. And therefore /dev/null can't be nothing.

    Or do I just need more tea? Or maybe whisk(e)y?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

    The word "nothing" isn't itself nothing. It is something used to describe nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    The word "nothing" is the English word describing the concept of nothing. And I have to use the word to describe the concept. So yes, you are correct the word is itself "something". So that is probably one point for "nothing" to not exist.

    I have now consumed 3 cups of tea. And my head now hurts from thinking about nothing. I should never have stepped into this post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    in fact that gets used in abstract mathematics to first introduce the natural numbers. the empty set (nothing) (which you define as 0) is not itself nothing, so you can define the set that contains just the empty set, which now is not empty itself, but contains one element, so you define that as 1 ...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Missing stage 7: Not everything is a file.

    Linux is closer than other *nixes (sysctl equivalents in some platforms are not files, but they are files in Linux).

    However get very far into network and the file-like behaviors become more limited. From an application, at least you have a decent chance of having unseekable, but otherwise 'file-like' interaction with stream protocols. Then you need recvmsg/sendmsg. Then you want to deal with low level interaction with the network stack and dealing with NETLINK and such..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately, no one can be told what a file is. You have to see it for yourself.

    This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the file system goes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (2 children)

    But what about the fotoes?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I suspect sarcasm but in case it is not, photos are just binary files, just like videos and many other file formats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Yep, takes a moment to wrap your head around but the longer you read linux/unix documentation, the more it makes sense why it is the case.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί