Ukraine’s security service blew up a railway connection linking Russia to China, in a clandestine strike carried out deep into enemy territory, with pro-Kremlin media reporting that investigators have opened a criminal case into a “terrorist attack.”

The SBU set off several explosions inside the Severomuysky tunnel of the Baikal-Amur highway in Buryatia, located some 6,000 kilometers east of Ukraine, a senior Ukrainian official with direct knowledge of the operation told POLITICO.

“This is the only serious railway connection between the Russian Federation and China. And currently, this route, which Russia uses, including for military supplies, is paralyzed,” the official said.

Four explosive devices went off while a cargo train was moving inside the tunnel. “Now the (Russian) Federal Security Service is working on the spot, the railway workers are unsuccessfully trying to minimize the consequences of the SBU special operation,” the Ukrainian official added.

Ukraine’s security service has not publicly confirmed the attack. Russia has also so far not confirmed the sabotage.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 361 points 2 years ago* (58 children)

OP missed the fun bit after the tunnel bombing:

The first cargo train exploded directly in the Severomuysky tunnel.

To continue transportation, the Russians began to use the detour route through the so-called Devil’s Bridge — a 35-meter high viaduct structure, which is part of the Trans-Siberian Railway. At that point, SBU saboteurs struck again.

“When the train was passing over this 35-meter high bridge, the explosive devices embedded in it went off,” the same official added.

  • source
  • hideshow 58 child comments
  • [–] 159 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Damn impressive.

    Sounds straight out of a WWII action/spy/war movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 125 points 2 years ago (42 children)

    Thanks for the details

    Just to add, according to Denys Davidov's report on ukraine, the first train was carrying jet fuel, which added to the whole explosion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (41 children)

    Jet fuel can't blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (34 children)

    Jet fuel can’t blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

    Wasn't that the reason though that the Twin Towers in NY fell, because the jet fuel melted the steel beams infrastructure?

    I had read/seen that the buildings were actually designed to handle a plane crashing into them, but the architects didn't expect the metal beams to melt from the high-temperature burning jet fuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    My understanding is that the beams were sprayed with a fire retardant foam that is designed to protect it in the event of a typical building fire. But the violent impact of the jets would have stripped most of it off, and the jet fuel did indeed weaken the beams. They wouldn’t have melted outright, but softening them after already being damaged by the impact was more than it could handle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yeah it's a really dumb meme because obviously it can. The ancient Romans worked steel, so obviously it doesn't have a particularly high melting temperature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. It doesn't burn nearly hot enough.

    However, for a structure to fail you don't need to melt the beams, and getting them hot enough will also damage their structural integrity; they'll fail long before they reach the melting point.

    And this is what happened on 9/11.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Even wood alone is capable of getting steel red hot under the right condition. Given my experience was with metal floor grating in a burn barrel. The steel became easily malleable with just a metal rod.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (36 children)

    It must be very hard for Russia to detect Ukrainians that work under cover in Russia, this must be a major vulnerability for Russia. Unfortunately the same is probably true the other way.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 2 years ago (34 children)

    Probably not so much the other way, most Ukrainians are fluent in Russian, I doubt many Russians are fluent in Ukranian

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I wonder how many Ukrainians can only speak Russian. Languages can be hard for some people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Can anyone explain how different the languages are? Super different or "they kind of get eachother, just are noticably different"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    Somebody once said to me that it's rather like the difference between English and Dutch.

    If you ever hear Dutch it rather sounds like English and you've just not quite heard them correctly. If you were in another room and just heard the ebb and flow of the language you'd probably not be able to tell the difference, but in person directly you can.

    And as a non-speaker of both languages they sound basically the same to me so I think it is true

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 49 points 2 years ago* (21 children)

    It is not the only railway connection. And there is still the original route from before this tunnel was built. So not sure how big the impact is.

    Source wikipedia

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

    I know virtually nothing about the Russian train system. Are all the routes able to carry the same loads? Older lines may have narrower tunnels, weaker bridges, etc. that are unable to transport the larger/heavier loads that Russia hopes to bring from China…

    Edit: Track gauge is another question. I did some quick Googling and it looks like Russia used to use 1,524 mm gauge while China uses 1,435 mm. If those other lines aren’t compatible with China then it means cargo would need to be unloaded from their trains at the border and then reloaded onto Russian trains. That would slow things down tremendously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

    Generally yes your lines can carry the same loads and have the same gauge. You want your internal logistics to be straightforward.

    Fun fact: Russia chose a different gauge to make it more difficult to invade them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    I'm curious whether China will take this as a personal affront and feel the need to save face by escalating their participation. That would not be ideal.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    China really has no reason to take this as an affront. China will continue milking Russia for money/oil and let them continue weaken themselves, but they have no reason to get involved or sell them weapons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I'm no expert, please take this with a massive chunk of salt, but as far as I understand it China is trying to balance their relationship with Russia with their relationship with the US. I'd expect the reaction to a rail bombing like this to be muted and cautious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Good point. It has seemed recently like they're trying to make nice with the US again all of a sudden. Some of their comments after visiting San Francisco were very out of step with their rhetoric up until recently. At least as far as what I have gathered from news articles. I don't really have a great grasp on the nuances of it myself. They're a difficult government to understand sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    One of 3 that exist between the two countries, I read elsewhere. If true, this is a BIG DEAL!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Dictatorships are only paper tigers inside.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›