If they do this in Europe, too, they are in for bad, bad times.
post
You should link the original video, not the article trying to farm the work Gamers Nexus did:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA
You can actually edit the link so you could in theory update the post.
Anyway, yeah. I just fully expect shit like this from tv companies. They're not TVs, they're surveillance boxes with a screen. They will collect any and all data they can. I stopped updating my 2018 model in about 2020 or so when it bricked itself by auto-updating to a version that required my signature on a new set of T&Cs, and if I didn't accept the new T&C's I couldn't use the TV any more. No downgrading to the old version, just "accept this or don't use your tv any more". So that was when I cut off its internet connection and never looked back. If it ever breaks or needs to be replaced I don't know what I'll do really - look for some projector or computer monitor I suppose, since all tvs are like this now.
Shout-out Sceptre TVs. Probably the only one you can trust anymore
GDPR ... this sounds like it could be very expensive for LG if a consumer agency reports it
The thing is, it just isnt even a surprise anymore. In fact I'd be more surprised if these devices weren't doing this. What worries me is that the industry seems to think its acceptable and more often than not there are no consequences.
Before buying a TV we researched what you can use without giving it internet access. Turns out that is quite a few. We got a Samsung and indeed we never had to, and just use it as a dumb screen
I haven't watched the Gamers Nexus video(they are the ones doing the research on this subject) yet, but according to their preview in their previous video, it seems they hinted at the fact that some tvs can access the internet even though you don't physically connect them.
I was also of the belief that if you just kept your smart tv dumb then it wouldn't be a problem, but it seems like that is not entirely true.
I've got no cell reception inside, thanks to aluminum siding, but it's going to be annoying as fuck if I have to open up my next TV and figure out which circuit board traces are antennae or which chips are wireless.
Oh damn, that's a long video... since we already have a TV I guess I won't be watching the entire thing.
I guess they could do that if they included a wireless modem in the TV. That would be kind of crazy though - companies don't make that much money off harvesting user data like this, so paying for a mobile connection would be surprising to me.
IIRC the user marketing data exfiltration method pioneered by Samsung several years ago involves a form of Bluetooth P2P/mesh networking whereby a TV with no internet connection can handshake with, for example, a neighbor’s TV which does have internet enabled or, if they’re just as tinfoil as you and disabled their internet, your data and theirs could simply be relayed to another neighbor’s TV on a different floor, etc etc
You've got to admire it on one level.
Hopefully they're too scared of the GDPR to try that shit here.
Yes, quite clever. No iron ring for the engineer, but I’m sure they were briefly proud of themselves.
That’s a good question re: gdpr. Regional activation of those modules in FW revision is certainly possible. But my guess is that the difference relates to the payload contents and whether or which PII is permitted by any particular local laws, since I expect that would maximize profits.
sure, we've already got every other parallel between reality and fictional fascist dystopias that we've already had and I'm too lazy to list, why not telescreens, too. Let's build the Torment Nexus while we're at it, assuming AI isn't that already. Just go for broke, see what I care anymore. All hail Big Brother Lucky Goldstar.
all 24 comments