About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn't patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the "Translate Page" feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there's no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed "spammy" or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you're logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google's end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I'd be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto's. Can't really control that.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 1 point 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[removed by mod]
  • source
  • [+] 1 point 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 139 points 1 week ago (25 children)

    Duck is as good as Google was before they got gimped by laws and insane levels of advertising. Have been using it religiously for months, no issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Kagi user for over two years now, can recommend if you’re not against paying for quality search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago

    The future of search engines is in the settings. Allowing you to control how you search is the only weapon against the direction Google imagine we all should find stuff online.

    Kagi is the only search engine who has embraced this and they get my money for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    This. Can't tell you the last time I used Google directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    A few days ago when I was converting an old windows desktop to Linux I hit Google on accident (Firefox default).

    On the first page I got 2 traditional search results. They were links to AI slop sites. The entire rest of the page was full of useless crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Maybe its just me, but I find I get way more useless seo blog spam results using DuckDuckGo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    DDG uses Bing's index. I assume Bing doesn't nerf AI in rankings as I get so many slop AI SEO sites that I don't get on an equivalent Google search. I used DDG itself before like 2024, but now I reflexively add !g if I don't think !w will work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    I've been using duck for at least 3 years, probably closer to 6 or 7. When I first used it, its searches were okay, but if I couldn't find what I was looking for a quick trip to Google would fix that. I felt like it improved slightly over some time, but also Google got a lot worse. Now with the AI proliferation, I never bother going to Google, and duck is still better than it was a year or two ago. Their AI has about a 20 or 30% success rate for me, but I just use it as a top search if I use it at all. I would love it if the results didn't change when I run the same search 2 minutes apart, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 67 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

    So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don't want to get scraped themselves?

    That's the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    That's why everyone should try and avoid google and use some alternatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    Surprised nobody has mentioned Ecosia yet. Web searches there are responsible for planting 250,000,000 trees. I can’t think of a better justification for using a search engine.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago

    Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

    From there FAQ:

    Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

    Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. [...]

    How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

    [...] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. [...]

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I love ecosia.

    STOP USING GOOGLE PRODUCT A FFS THEY ARE SHIT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Just switch. To anything, really.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I got this too a few weeks ago and couldn't find any information on how to convert the address back to normal. I guess it makes sense if most people don't get those results. My fix was to just use a different search engine.

    fyi, I got it while I was logged in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    You’ve probably not seen it. It only happens when you’re logged out.

    Heh, I haven't seen it because I don't use google.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    an underrated feature in duckduckgo is easily toggling between international search results and local (my country) search results. both are things I want often, but I much more rarely want to select any other country, so it makes sense for the toggle to work the way it does. also noai duckduckgo is a blessing.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Log in and your results are still clean links, so this has spread through scraper people and nobody else.

    Nobody else? Screw you, corporate fanboy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 week ago* (5 children)

    I wasn't aware of Qwant. It seems to build its own index instead of relying on other providers (great), and has proper backing to be a viable competitor in something so big (the French government seems to endorse it; along with institutional use in EU parliament?).
    I just tested it and unfortunately got a 403 however (FORBIDDEN). Though I was behind an endpoint of a very popular VPN for some testing, that sucks regardless.

    Actually, before I could post this, I tried the search refresh and it worked somehow.
    To test again I switched to another server of the same VPN provider (same selected country) and tried searching. Same error, which didn't go away after doing the refresh. So they might have some sort of spam prevention measure which eases itself automatically, but I feel like it could definitely be implemented better if that's the case.

    Edit: Yep, if you sit on that 403 page for 5-6 minutes without doing anything and then hit the relaunch your search button, things work as intended afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Glad we have stuff like Startpage and Kagi, which are both better than Google anyways. There's also Qwant, but it's not as good as Kagi or Startpage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›