Article fails to mention that these fish are typically deep frozen, which kills the parasites. And not all fish parasites infect humans.

This is concerning, but those are important to consider.

Is that remarkable? The authors make the prevalence of parasites as the big takeaway from their study, but bizarrely they don't cite any other papers of typical parasite load in this fish species or others. I need a frame of reference.

For a big fish, it's how many parasite they have not if there's one or not. When you're a giant fish the number matters. The article mostly talks about possible allergic reactions to some of the parasite antigens which can persist after the parasite is killed by freezing.

I think most fish have parasites???

If I liked seafood, I'd be making excuses for why it's okay for me to eat seafood.

Glad I don't like seafood.

How long have they been looking?