all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 week ago

This is the most relevant part: https://fsfe.org/news/2026/news-20260825-01.html#copyright-infringement

Software produced by agentic workflows almost inevitably reproduces copyrighted works for common functions like database access without the person using the LLM knowing. This makes the software produced as such non-FOSS and a ticking time bomb due to someone using code scanning tools for malicious litigation purposes similar to how patent trolls operate.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    Can we maybe just fuck off with the slopcode in the first place, and people who insist can do without "protection" on "their" "very meaningful" "work".

    It should already not be permitted in any free software

    Edit: lmao downvotes for being correct. Seethe

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I’d argue the opposite: because AI was certainly trained on massive amounts of copyleft code, all AI- generated code should be copyleft only, and under the most strict terms, just to be safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments