Elon Musk will not face charges for promising to give $1 million to voters in a 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court election because no jury would find that constituted election bribery, a state prosecutor said Tuesday.

Musk, the founder of SpaceX and CEO of Tesla, was deeply involved in the effort to flip majority control of the highest court in battleground Wisconsin last year. But the candidate he and Republicans backed lost to Democratic-supported Susan Crawford, whose victory preserved liberals' majority on the court.

The bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission in July referred two complaints to the Brown County district attorney’s office for possible charges, saying Musk likely broke the law. La Crosse County District Attorney Tim Gruenke was later appointed as a special prosecutor because of a conflict of interest.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 2 hours ago

state prosecutors can decide what the jury will say and that's enough to close the case

USA weird

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 5 hours ago

    Guess the prosecutor got paid off as well.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago

    If you want to get away with crime in America, just be rich.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    I used to like Elon until he started talking.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    no jury would find that constituted election bribery

    Why not? Are they planning to let Elon Musk bribe the jury, as well?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 hours ago*

    La Crosse County District Attorney Tim Gruenke, a Democrat, announced on Tuesday that he didn’t think he could convince a jury that Musk had made a bribe with the posts.

    Gonna write this guy a nice letter...

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

    no jury would find that constituted election bribery, a state prosecutor said

    Even though the Wisconsin Elections Commission found probable cause that Elon Musk broke the law ?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago

    La Crosse's demographics and voting history is just marginally more for Democrats so I wonder what the justification is besides "nah"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    Because of course he does.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 hours ago
    [–] 1 point 5 hours ago*

    Pretty sure if Elon goes before a jury, he is getting convicted regardless of what he is charged with cause of how much people don't like him but he'll probably find a way to bribe or blackmail a jury member or two.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago
    [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    Maybe he bribed the jury…

  • source