all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Looks like a zaney character on a sitcom.

    Wooooaaaah!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I mean, not that forbidden, they're plenty edible. The article even briefly mentions them being used as empanada filling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Crazy that someone thought it would be interesting to try eating them.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Go play with one. It'll get serious FAST

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I don't think they're dangerous. They're not like cone snails. Am I missing something? Also, I still don't want to play with one, but that's because I don't think they would like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    As long as you’re not a Crown of Thrones starfish, you should be fine.

    Cone Snails are the venomous type of sea snail in the genus Conidae, with a radular tooth that injects neurotoxic venom. Conch snails are from Strombidae and are not poisonous, being primarily herbivorous.

    However, the Giant Triton Conch snail is an exception and is an active predator that eats starfish and other marine invertebrates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    They just look annoyed you tipped their houses up on end, and now they have to tip it back down without any arms, legs, and just one foot!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    New Picasso just dropped.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    The Divine Essiel disagree

  • source