47
A crawler wanted to know who talks to whom on our server (www.martinmuc.de)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Fascinating data presented in a clearly AI written or at least heavily edited format that makes it really hard to read without massive skepticism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    +1, I have actual trouble reading stuff like this, even though the content is interesting. My eyes just glaze over. I would rather read someones unfiltered low effort garbled mess of a post than a polished article sounding like ai

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)

    Please provide some evidence that this is AI written.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    The phrasing and pacing sound repeatedly “but wait there’s more” style that AI seems to favor. Always trying to re-emphasize a point already made to make the reader interpret it a specific way.

    Not to mention the em-dashes.

    Sometimes good writing sounds like that too, but good writers also know to not use and repeat that same style over every paragraph.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not posts. Relationships.

    One paragraph in and the DiGiorno pattern (it's not x, it's y) is an immediate red flag.

    I'm not saying humans don't do this, but it's overwhelmingly an AI thing now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Dude, AI detectors do not work and those idiots running them are increasing the harm done by AI, because now people and students have to defend themselves against AI-usage allegations. Your tool even says "confidence limited" and "We believe that this text is 100% AI", which is really idiotic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    You asked for evidence.

    List out the evidence you accept.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Aside: that is a very nice font.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •