top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 3 years ago

I appreciate the fact that the distro community is diverse enough to accommodate even people whose personal preferences are this objectively wrong. ;)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    With the number of atrocities that manjaro has committed, it should be crucified. https://manjarno.snorlax.sh

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    My personal list is short:

    1. Debian (Testing) - evertything works OOTB. Great performance. Stable. Plenty of current packages. Works on my workstation, laptop, RPi.
    2. FreeBSD ;) - if you really want an alternative.
  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Wait a minute. Since when are LXQt and XFCE "Distributions" ?

    I don't even know what that vaguely gear-like one in the top tier is, or the one next to the geeko in the second tier are.

    (Just as a sidenote, as one of the openSUSE LXQt maintainers, and sometimes LXQt Upstream contributor, if we're providing our own distro somewhere, this is the first I've heard of it.)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    PopOS is not too far off from a DeCanonicalled Ubuntu with extensions. It is little more than the Gnome extensions it contains, and the project could just as easily be just the pop-desktop package. They ship a year old desktop and it is rather unrefined.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    a DeCanonicalled Ubuntu with extensions

    You say that like it's a bad thing. Flatpak and no snaps by default is pretty decent

    They ship a year old desktop

    Wait until you hear what Linux Mint uses lol. Also, it's no rolling release but they do keep packages and the kernel up to date

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Why's pop so low? I haven't used Linux for a while, but I recall liking it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Most likely personal preference; some people really dislike heavily customized DEs out of the box, and some prefer faster releases than PopOS has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Somewhat correct. For other reasons refer to this comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    A lot of Distros could just be scripts run on other mainstream distros, but PopOS, as you have mentioned, has a different release cycle. So it needs different repos, and that could be a little bit hard to maintain as a script.

    They also have a separate installer that has features for a better Nvidia experience, which is very hard to pull off as a script (also very hard to pull off in general; because Nvidia).

    With the new Cosmic DE and the new tools they've written using a different toolkit, it will be a lot harder to maintain that script, and they may need to make a new flavour of Ubuntu; "Cobuntu", that will not be an official flavour, because it doesn't use snaps.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›