109
submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/science@mander.xyz
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 12 points 3 days ago

Oh no, how could we not have seen this coming?

[-] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

Far as I can remember, it was always predicted to be an exponential curve - especially with each year’s fire season growing more intense than the last.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Each thing feeds the next. Melting ice warms the ocean which then melts more ice and so on.

[-] Uli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

Yep, also exposes darker land masses which absorbs more heat. And thaws methane and CO2 which gets released into the atmosphere. And warms the atmosphere itself which can then hold more water vapor which also acts as a greenhouse gas. Not to mention slowing ocean currents and the die-off of diatoms leading to reduced atmospheric oxygen. We've been warned about this stuff for decades. If only anyone with any power actually did something about it.

[-] BeN9o@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Hmm I wonder if it might have anything to do with all the data centres popping up everywhere??

[-] from_D4rkness@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Scientists were already ringing the alarm, and the corporate overlords answered with more data centers! Surely AGI will figure it out!

[-] shrugs@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago

wouldn't it be funny if agi will be achieved and the only solution it finds against global warming is shutting down all AI?!

[-] motionofethre@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago

But AI will fix it though!!!! /s

Honestly, AI is a very cool technology. I work it in and I love it, but it's amazingly disappointing that instead of building models up fold proteins and advance humanity, we built propaganda bots, surveillance and people outsource their intelligence.

And we could have invested heavily into more efficient competing, but instead we just burn the world.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

I wouldn't say that they have that much effect yet.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah, there's localized effects. Like where I live, particulate matter and ozone skyrocketed after they installed a massive gas-powered datacenter in the neighboring town. But globally, it takes forever for these effects to pile up and cause a dent. Which is why they are measured in average increase per decade.

[-] HylicManoeuvre@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

Main source of those is combustion engines btw

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

There hasn't been a doubling of car traffic in the same time period.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

They have the effect of massively increasing our energy consumption at a time when we desperately need to cut down on it. Just to mention one thing in the slew of disastrous things this AI bubble is causing to our ability to just do the bare minimal to counter our climate disaster.

[-] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

No, it’s unlikely that a cause follows it’s effects in time. Usually we think a cause happens first and then an effect follows.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

I detected it too.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No one ever said global climate change was going to be linear. Nature is rarely linear.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Typically average temperatures follow a pattern of jumping up a notch every 10-15 years.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Without humans

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)

Science

7203 readers
145 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS