Tunick’s case also raises ongoing questions about what constitutional rights can be invoked at the border, which the U.S. government has long asserted is not U.S. soil until a person is authorized to enter.

So do the laws apply at the border or not? If he has no constitutional rights because he's supposedly not on U.S. soil, then he couldn't be breaking U.S. law, since he technically isn't there...

And? Was there a court order preventing it at the time?

https://lemmy.today/c/news is a fascist anti-woke instance, and @PapaSkwat@lemmy.today will ban you for downvoting or disagreeing in anyway.

I'm surprised they even posted this article but I think it may just be to grow their terrible community.

Point is, don't crosspost them. If you think it should be shared then just make a newpost, don't give them traffic or normalization.

I’m confused. The constitution always applies between US citizens and US agents regardless of location. The 5th amendment applies here.

It honestly sounds like they are either trying to further besmirch/criminalize GrapheneOS or they are butthurt that they got tricked.