▲ 51 ▼ New York City to become first in US to ban deceptive subscription practices (www.theguardian.com) submitted 1 month ago by remington@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org 5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] colournoun@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago And we’re starting with the New York Times, right? permalink fedilink source
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 month ago (2 children) That this isn't some federal rule already is asinine. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago If you don't like getting scammed just don't buy from them FREE MARKET BABYYYY - some chud probably permalink fedilink source parent [–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Federal law states that you have to allow people to cancel their subscription the same way as they signed up. But some state's decided that they would pass laws giving exception to gyms. Want to guess which party runs those States? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 month ago It seems odd that a state can override a federal law. I mean when there's a minimum or maximum, e.g. minimum age to get licensed to drive. A state could raise the minimum (or lower a maximum) to strengthen the federal law. But to weaken one? I suppose it's subjective. Are they weakening consumer protection or strengthening corporate 'freedom'? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago If you don't like getting scammed just don't buy from them FREE MARKET BABYYYY - some chud probably permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Federal law states that you have to allow people to cancel their subscription the same way as they signed up. But some state's decided that they would pass laws giving exception to gyms. Want to guess which party runs those States? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 month ago It seems odd that a state can override a federal law. I mean when there's a minimum or maximum, e.g. minimum age to get licensed to drive. A state could raise the minimum (or lower a maximum) to strengthen the federal law. But to weaken one? I suppose it's subjective. Are they weakening consumer protection or strengthening corporate 'freedom'? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 month ago It seems odd that a state can override a federal law. I mean when there's a minimum or maximum, e.g. minimum age to get licensed to drive. A state could raise the minimum (or lower a maximum) to strengthen the federal law. But to weaken one? I suppose it's subjective. Are they weakening consumer protection or strengthening corporate 'freedom'? permalink fedilink source parent
all 5 comments