181
submitted 21 hours ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/android@lemmy.world

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/67481084

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

We need a ban on checking the manufacturer/supplier of a device/os instead of checking for APIs.

[-] massacre@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Was literally looking at a new VW the other day while getting some warranty work done (non VW). This news dropped the same day on my Lemmy feed and I said that takes VW out of the running.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 12 hours ago

I will never use an app to interface with a car

[-] CoriolisSTORM88@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Good news, you’ve not missed anything. It’s a shit app for the id4 at least.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 30 points 16 hours ago

Hahahaha

Fuck you VW, and your hypocrisy.

Remember Dieselgate anyone?

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 107 points 21 hours ago

updated its mobile apps to no longer support GrapheneOS

This is not accurate. They updated the app to actively block GrapheneOS and other third-party Android builds.

The distinction is critical; unsupported combinations often work.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 17 hours ago

They updated the app to use the Play Integrity API, which GOS does not meet.

Not that it means anything, of course. GOS is far more secure than Google's laughable excuse of a certification.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

They updated the app to use the "Play Integrity[sic] API," which actively blocks GOS.

"Does not meet" implies there is something reasonable GOS could do to "fix" it, which untrue and misleading. The malice on Google's and Volkswagen's part is an important part of the story.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Requiring a valid Play Integrity API response is a blanket enforcement on all custom ROMs, regardless of security measures.

This was not a targeted attack on Graphene. GOS users just tend to be more vocal and....paranoid.

“Does not meet” implies there is something reasonable GOS could do to “fix” it

"Does not meet" has more than one meaning. Don't play dumb.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I didn't say the attack was "targeted" only on GOS; you made that up yourself. But it is an attack, as opposed to something with a valid excuse.

Also: it's only paranoia if they aren't actually out to get you.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago

Big companies have been trying to lock out custom ROMs for years, it's a giant cat and mouse game. The integrity bullshit thing is just another move. And the fascists in charge have been stripping regulations which is allowing these companies to make such bold moves.

I think we're on the same page here. I apologize for coming off so harsh.

[-] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

That is until the official Motorola partnership happens with GoS and Motorola. It's the missing piece for integrity verification as of current listed requirements on Google's documentation. They needed to have first class support from a major OEM. Looking forward to seeing how Google will change that maliciously. This includes attestation.

[-] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

The pessimist in me thinks the GrapheneOS Motorola partnership won't happen, Google will put pressure on Motorola and make it fail. I really hope I'm wrong though.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

That is until the official Motorola partnership happens with GoS and Motorola. It’s the missing piece for integrity verification as of current listed requirements on Google’s documentation. They needed to have first class support from a major OEM. Looking forward to seeing how Google will change that maliciously. This includes attestation.

Good point, I didn't think about that. It will be very interesting to see what happens.

[-] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Interesting indeed. I know I'll be buying one pretty much no matter what as long as reasonably priced.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

This is very odd, agree with the devs. Seems like a very aggressive action and with no reasoning behind it?

I wonder what the real story is.. What had GrapheneOS enabled (or blocked) on user phones that got their executives so pissed they'd explicitly block GrapheneOS users from their apps?

[-] Carighan@piefed.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's just stupid oversight, they switched to the Play Store API, which naturally excludes Graphene OS. But mind you this is the same managerial incompetence that brought us the lack of a Volks-Wagen (an affordable car that is) from Volkswagen, withdrawing partially from BEVs just as they get fully embraced and the sales start to accelerate, and of course who could forget the let's be honest fully C-suite ordered Diesel exhaust cheating.

At this point, Volkswagen needs to be shut down and all middle~executive management needs to be prosecuted going back 20 or so years. They're all criminally incompetent and ruined thousands of livelihoods with their negligence.

[-] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 18 hours ago

I'm sure we'll get that transparency any minute now. Same transparency I'm waiting for why my work is going for Return-to-office while simultaneously short on desks to return to office.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

They changed something in the play integrity or one of those similar libraries. They're not explicitly targeting GrapheneOS, it's affecting some other platforms too. It was also affecting iPhones, but I think they've since fixed that.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Maybe, the technical explanation is hopefully forthcoming. The article (which I will concede doesn't seem super professional) explicitly says "banned by Volkswagen", which is what I'm curious about.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 17 hours ago
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Thanks for that! Sounds like SEAT and Cupra (both have Volkswagen Group as their parent companies) are also affected - I wonder when this will spread to other Volkswagen & Porche-owned brands. What a terrible move for consumer choice/security/etc.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 43 points 20 hours ago

Companies that don't respect your privacy don't deserve your money either.

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 24 points 19 hours ago

Problem is, thanks to capitalism, you're no longer choosing from dozens of companies. You're choosing between 2-3 conglomerates that own the dozens of brands. And all conglomerates will do the exact same shit, because they can, and you're left twiddling your thumbs, not choosing between auto manufacturers but between owning a vehicle or not.

[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Buy used, it's much smarter anyway, as you avoid a lot of depreciation that way.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Eventually the supply of used cars that don't do this shit is going to run out.

Stop confusing workarounds for a solution. The only actual solution is political: banning these anti-consumer practices entirely.

[-] mrbn@lemmy.ca 32 points 20 hours ago

This should get interesting when motorola releases a phone with GrapheneOS on it.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 39 points 20 hours ago

With the number of countries trying to crack down on privacy-focused phone OSs, I'm a little worried Motorola may get cold feet after talking to its lawyers. Has Motorola made any public statement promising these phones are coming?

[-] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Agreed. As desperate as I am for a genuine OEM GrapheneOS phone, I won't believe it until it actually happens.

[-] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Correct take. Corps only care about money and reputation.

[-] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Just presume it contains spyware my dude. Even if the company had the best intentions they'd just get infiltrated by private and state spies. But Motorola is literally run by the likes of the NSA, CIA and that it isn't a secret they are a US military infrastructure provider. They got so ingrained in the military that they had to split the company up but same same.

[-] MoreZombies@quokk.au 1 points 4 hours ago

"They are two separate companies but same same"

Yeah, okay..

[-] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Yep same same with any other big tech firm.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

But Motorola is literally run by the likes of the NSA, CIA and that it isn’t a secret they are a US military infrastructure provider. They got so ingrained in the military that they had to split the company up but same same.

You're thinking of Motorola Solutions. It and Motorola Mobility, the smartphone company, haven't been related since 2011. The latter was spun off of the original Motorola as a completely different company over 15 years ago, and at this point is wholly owned subsidiary of Lenovo. The two may share a name, but that's about it.

Motorola Solutions is the publicly-traded "true successor" to the original Motorola conglomerate, while Motorola Mobility is nothing more than an LLC underneath a much larger umbrella that is Lenovo and it's own Chinese parent holding company.

[-] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Yea but same same.

[-] jobbies@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

Thats fine, Volkswagen is hereby banned from my life.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 16 hours ago

Already was for me, their cars are worse than American cars. I'd sooner a Ford or Chevy. And I haven't owned an American car in 20 years.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

VW is Audi too for those who don't know.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 21 points 19 hours ago

Volkswagen Auto Group (VAG) is huge. It contains:

  • SEAT
  • Skoda
  • Cupra
  • VW
  • Audi
  • Lamborghini
  • Bently
  • Ducati
  • Porsche
  • MAN
  • International
  • Scania

And that’s just the vehicles.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I forgot VAG owns International now...

Don't forget about the currywurst sausages! Part number 199 398 500 A

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

That's fine, I wouldn't own a Volkswagen unless it was given to me.

And then I'd sell it.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The only VW I'll own is air-cooled, or equipped with the EA827 (diesel or gas, either is fine).

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

That's fair, I'd probably keep one of those too.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 16 hours ago

Yep, at least those had a reason for being what they are.

Any other VW is garbage.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

TBF, I would love a Mk1 Rabbit GTI (what the Golf was called in the US for a while). Mostly so I can restore it and gift it to my dad. He had a Mk1 GTI long ago, I remember only bits and pieces of it since he sold it when I was little. But he absolutely loved that car.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
181 points (99.5% liked)

Android

34331 readers
442 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS