1187
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] thepig@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Remember the countries that voted in the UN against food being a human right ? The USA and Israel.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Genocidal zio kids grow up starving people.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMgqTwyoV_D/

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah these two would vote against air being a human right.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

No we obviously built agriculture so we could have futures trading

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Food should not be a commodity

Would you prefer it was a luxury?

[-] Bieren@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

The shareholders disagree. And their opinion is the only one that matters

[-] PacketPilgrim 23 points 3 days ago

What is the point of automation and mass production when the prices of certain basic staples keeps going up? You are really going to tell me we can't get a loaf of bread down to 1 dollar?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

What is the point of automation and mass production when the prices of certain basic staples keeps going up?

Horizontal Integration Explained

Companies pursue horizontal integration for synergies like economies of scale or cost savings in marketing, R&D, production, and distribution. This can make manufacturing multiple products more cost-effective. Tiers of sale under a single distributor (economy and generic versus luxury or specialty) also afford the corporate entity to scale price to income and maximize revenue per customer.

The "organic" label is a good example of this in practice. Add a 50% mark-up on bananas by telling people the "regular" bananas are unsafe. Anyone who can't tolerate the professed risk (typically people with more disposable income) end up paying extra to the same distributor for what is functionally the same product sold at a premium price.

Automation and Mass Production are tools of monopolization in the capitalist economic model. The efficiencies of production are used to lock competitors out of the market, not to improve the consumer-experienced efficiency of production, distribution, or sale.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 4 days ago

When we can't feed everyone, that's weakness, and it is sad.

When its a choice, that's power, and its fun!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gurty@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

50s Prediction: In the future, robots will do menial tasks so you can focus on arts, family and science!

Actuality: You lost you job as an artist to AI. Enjoy a lifetime of debt and poverty. Maybe you can find some menial way to sustain yourself just enough to barely live.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

For profit. Who cares about people?

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

It already is, dumbass.

Note: It's a right in the sense of "it should be available to buy", but not "you can get it for free"-kind-of-right.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Uhh it starts with I can't believe anyone would think implying there are a lot of people who don't think it is a right. Your or the UN's declaration that it is right means nothing if people don't agree to it. Besides, the devil is always in the details.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/09/united-nations-right-to-food-us-hunger

A right can be positive or negative. Saying you have the right to buy food without money is pointless. A positive right would mean someone would need to provide you that food if you can't afford it. What type of right and is it provided if needed is the crux of the issue.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

And if you go back to the original community structure it was the family or tribe - where the whole point was group survival, not luxury for a few while the majority scraped by.

[-] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

We've done this. The people in charge of the killing are the new kings.

Not saying it'll yield a worse situation, tho.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 44 points 4 days ago

To make more food to stockpile and force people to buy or watch rot you silly billy!

Seriously though. Its one thing to want to sell the food, I get that people gotta get paid, but the fact that in a lot of places we just throw away the unsold food to rot in the rubbish is ridiculous!

Like seriously, we're just gonna throw away this food rather than even attempt to give it to those in need, and fire anybody who tries, cause it might slightly eat into profits?? That's just psychopathic levels of corporate apathy.

[-] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 4 days ago

There are places where the trash bins of supermarkets are locked so homeless people can't take thrown away food from them

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The excess is also insane. When people can't afford or won't afford the high beef prices, will the corporations who make it produce less or take it to market to be used in more sustainable products? As a society we've moved to not just make sure enough food is available but that everyone has an opportunity to purchase anything they might want. With fresh foods that means guaranteed waste, which means higher prices to make up for that waste.

My great grandparents ran a grocery store in a very small town. My grandfather ran a butcher counter that he got regular deliveries for and everyone in town knew the schedule, once the meat was gone, that was it until the next delivery. They grew produce in the summer and always canned any excess. There was always enough food for everyone who cared to buy it, but there wasn't so much that everyone could get everything at any time.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Food, shelter and warmth are the only things we need. And we have more than enough for every single person on earth. Boy oh boy did we ever reveal our shortcomings as a race. Even barn rats look out for each other.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

It was implied with food but you are correct.

Yeah and water might soon become the one thing we don't have enough of

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Who is "we"? What "race"?

No thanks on this vague distraction from the actual blame.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

We? Fucking humans. Earthlings. God the divisiveness has eaten deep into your brain.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

The human race, I presume. Even though humanity isn't a race. English is so fucked up.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You are correct. I want everyone to have everything (or at least the opportunity).

[-] MrEff@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[-] alapakala@quokk.au 27 points 4 days ago

Liberals absolutely loath the hungry and starve people for entertainment. They hate the fact that anarchists adore their comrades and feed ourselves for solidarity.
Tell a liberal to open a canteen, and see how they send cops to destroy free food caravan.
Food not Bombs arrests

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Housing, healthcare, clean water and food security are all human fuxking rights

[-] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We were forced to build it by people with ambitions for power who were willing to kill, torture and starve us into compliance. Our civilizations are all descended from slaver societies.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Capitalism can not exist without the violent deprivation of basic human needs.

[-] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Fr, where do people think their clothes come from?

[-] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 2 days ago

So the issue is: we industrialized because we wanted to sell more food while paying less people for working. Not because we wanted to make the world a better place.

Industrialization and AI are actually very similar. Both were pushed by rich people who wanted to pay less for producing more.

And just like industrialization, push to use AI is lowering quality of everything. Because quality things cannot be mass-produced.

[-] Snowwdropp@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Quality things can be mass-produced but you don't have to renew them as often and you quickly reach saturation of the market and thus your sales plumet.

So they prefer enshittification and planned obsolescence...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
1187 points (98.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2558 readers
289 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS