144
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago

this is a bullshit argument

one side in US politics is pretty ANTI death camp while the other is very much PRO death camp. lesser evil voting in this case is ANTI death camp

you putz

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] plutopos@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 weeks ago

You vote for the lesser evil because that's the limit of what you can achieve in the voting booth. But voting isn't the only thing you can do to change society, obviously. I think these kinds of posts are missing the bigger picture

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] jarvis@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

This is a false premise. Instead of choosing which evil we want to accept, we can choose which evil we prefer to resist.

[-] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

The electoral system also gives that lesser evil legitimacy, insert robot voice: "they were voted for democratically, these protesters all just hate democracy and {country.capitalized()}!".

In all seriousness, what you are putting forward requires actual resistance, not just marching in the streets like is too common nowadays, but actual efforts to make it hell for people in power, and it actually makes it harder if the people in power can make you look unreasonable because you voted for them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 13 points 2 weeks ago

True, and I agree, but we do actually have to resist for that to be the case. Not just with the signs and angry letters we've been using to try to convince the corrupt to simply not be corrupt anymore, but with actions that actually prevent them from making things worse, up to and including their death, if necessary. Until then we really are just voting for the lesser evil and letting them do whatever they want.

[-] PotatoPie@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

Resist by giving them legitimacy

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Resist all of them

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

...but you don't live in a world where one party is building 50 and the other 51. That's just a strawman to avoid taking responsibility for having to choose between the actual options, not the options you wish you had.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 26 points 2 weeks ago
[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 weeks ago

I fucking hate that we keep getting this "both sides bad" ideology, now "both sides deathcamp" ffs, right during Trump's reign where we are seeing concentration camps and illegal wars right after a boring Biden presidency.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's coming up to election season, so all the sabateuor bots are spinning up again to try and convince people like you not to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Idk, if given the choice between 50 death camps or 51 death camps, it would be pretty fucked up to choose 51.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

This is how you know someone only cares about their own moral superiority complex and is the type of person that loves handing out arbitrary purity tests.

People like you are actually just at harmful to left wing goals as any fascist or neoliberal. You are the rot from within.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Kwiila@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

Vote local, vote to end FPTP.

Biden admitted he didn't want the DOJ to go after Trump for sedition in a hope for bipartsianship. He could have released the Epstein files then unredacted but didn't. He has a history of voting for federal increases to police budgets, he was the sponsor on the bill making it nearly impossible to discharge federal student loans in bankruptcy. And that's just Biden.

What to know what's most damning about the Democrats? In the build up to this situation, through it all, when they had enough power to do something they didn't do it. Obama could of put in changes to federal student loans but didn't, they were a problem way before then. They had decades to codify Roe vs Wade into law instead of a supreme court ruling.

At best they're inactive and inattentive.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 2 weeks ago

At best! And that's extremely generous.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

We need a revolution 🇦🇱✊🏼nothing will improve until the pedophile class lives in fear

[-] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

Problem solved! We'll all just go...not vote?

Hmmm...that doesn't seem right. Doesn't that let all the people who really want to vote for the 51 death camps decide who's in charge then?

load more comments (69 replies)
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For the love of Christ. If it comes down to 50 death camps vs 51 death camps and you couldn't muster up enough loud vocal grass roots support for 'no death camps' to make it feel like there is even an outside chance of winning enough that people don't feel that they have to vote for the lesser 50, then maybe you should examine why that is. I'm tired of this stupid fucking argument.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Tell me, what's the alternative?

I don't see one. You're just fucking grandstanding.

So, I'm what, supposed to not vote at all?

Then the actual evil will win

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Americans seem to think they are due some sort of fair and equitable civil society without having to fight for it. Actual evil will win anyway unless you fight the evil people and take a stand, constantly-- not occasionally when its only relevant to you. The problem is that americans are too spoiled and are lazy with their politics and morals. They just lay there like baby birds waiting to be fed, so the evils take advantage of that lethargy and here we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 weeks ago

You only say that because you want the 51 death camps party to win.

[-] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lesser evil voting is simply the limited options given to us under a broken system.

Until the system can be broken, I'd still rather attempt to cause less harm and impede the organization to break the system as little as possible.

I'll vote for the least establishment option amongst our de-facto options presented when it's time to vote. In the meantime I'll help with organizing, with advocacy, with 3rd party groups, with building alternatives to our capitalist system to support the revolution when it's time.

Would you rather me not vote and allow one more to not be countered towards the more establishment option that would work towards pulling back our rights even faster?

There shouldn't be any death camps, fucking obviously, but that would be 1 less we have to destroy in the coming days. Work to break the system so we don't have death camps, but also work to slow it down as much as possible so we have less to fight to break the system.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] shweddy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Damn election season already?

[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is true. The problem is, in a lot of US elections, you only have bad choices. You have really bad, and a little less bad than really bad. What I wouldn't give for ranked choice voting.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

If I did something to prevent the fifty first death camp and you did nothing, I will sleep soundly.

Show me a path to 0 death camps and I will work towards it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not the point. The point is to move toward a better party. On every vote you move towards a better outcome.

The options at the moment are bad or total destruction. Let’s vote for bad so we have some chance to go for something better.

All this argument you have does is make less people vote for so we move towards total destruction faster.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Time to vote for Jill stein I guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I wish it was possible to get lesser evilists to think rationally and critically examine their ideology, but they've so internalized their ideology as "rational" that they can't even recognize it as an ideology at all. They are exactly the sort of irrational, blind dogmatists they accuse everyone else of being.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
144 points (66.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3420 readers
907 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS