top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 3 months ago (41 children)

this is a bullshit argument

one side in US politics is pretty ANTI death camp while the other is very much PRO death camp. lesser evil voting in this case is ANTI death camp

you putz

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • load more comments (41 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    You vote for the lesser evil because that's the limit of what you can achieve in the voting booth. But voting isn't the only thing you can do to change society, obviously. I think these kinds of posts are missing the bigger picture

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 40 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    This is a false premise. Instead of choosing which evil we want to accept, we can choose which evil we prefer to resist.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    The electoral system also gives that lesser evil legitimacy, insert robot voice: "they were voted for democratically, these protesters all just hate democracy and {country.capitalized()}!".

    In all seriousness, what you are putting forward requires actual resistance, not just marching in the streets like is too common nowadays, but actual efforts to make it hell for people in power, and it actually makes it harder if the people in power can make you look unreasonable because you voted for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    True, and I agree, but we do actually have to resist for that to be the case. Not just with the signs and angry letters we've been using to try to convince the corrupt to simply not be corrupt anymore, but with actions that actually prevent them from making things worse, up to and including their death, if necessary. Until then we really are just voting for the lesser evil and letting them do whatever they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    ...but you don't live in a world where one party is building 50 and the other 51. That's just a strawman to avoid taking responsibility for having to choose between the actual options, not the options you wish you had.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 months ago (35 children)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (34 children)

    I fucking hate that we keep getting this "both sides bad" ideology, now "both sides deathcamp" ffs, right during Trump's reign where we are seeing concentration camps and illegal wars right after a boring Biden presidency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • load more comments (32 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (28 children)

    Idk, if given the choice between 50 death camps or 51 death camps, it would be pretty fucked up to choose 51.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • load more comments (28 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    This is how you know someone only cares about their own moral superiority complex and is the type of person that loves handing out arbitrary purity tests.

    People like you are actually just at harmful to left wing goals as any fascist or neoliberal. You are the rot from within.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    Vote local, vote to end FPTP.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Biden admitted he didn't want the DOJ to go after Trump for sedition in a hope for bipartsianship. He could have released the Epstein files then unredacted but didn't. He has a history of voting for federal increases to police budgets, he was the sponsor on the bill making it nearly impossible to discharge federal student loans in bankruptcy. And that's just Biden.

    What to know what's most damning about the Democrats? In the build up to this situation, through it all, when they had enough power to do something they didn't do it. Obama could of put in changes to federal student loans but didn't, they were a problem way before then. They had decades to codify Roe vs Wade into law instead of a supreme court ruling.

    At best they're inactive and inattentive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

    For the love of Christ. If it comes down to 50 death camps vs 51 death camps and you couldn't muster up enough loud vocal grass roots support for 'no death camps' to make it feel like there is even an outside chance of winning enough that people don't feel that they have to vote for the lesser 50, then maybe you should examine why that is. I'm tired of this stupid fucking argument.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 months ago (69 children)

    Problem solved! We'll all just go...not vote?

    Hmmm...that doesn't seem right. Doesn't that let all the people who really want to vote for the 51 death camps decide who's in charge then?

  • source
  • hideshow 69 child comments
  • load more comments (69 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    We need a revolution 🇦🇱✊🏼nothing will improve until the pedophile class lives in fear

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (28 children)

    Tell me, what's the alternative?

    I don't see one. You're just fucking grandstanding.

    So, I'm what, supposed to not vote at all?

    Then the actual evil will win

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Americans seem to think they are due some sort of fair and equitable civil society without having to fight for it. Actual evil will win anyway unless you fight the evil people and take a stand, constantly-- not occasionally when its only relevant to you. The problem is that americans are too spoiled and are lazy with their politics and morals. They just lay there like baby birds waiting to be fed, so the evils take advantage of that lethargy and here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    You only say that because you want the 51 death camps party to win.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (16 children)

    Lesser evil voting is simply the limited options given to us under a broken system.

    Until the system can be broken, I'd still rather attempt to cause less harm and impede the organization to break the system as little as possible.

    I'll vote for the least establishment option amongst our de-facto options presented when it's time to vote. In the meantime I'll help with organizing, with advocacy, with 3rd party groups, with building alternatives to our capitalist system to support the revolution when it's time.

    Would you rather me not vote and allow one more to not be countered towards the more establishment option that would work towards pulling back our rights even faster?

    There shouldn't be any death camps, fucking obviously, but that would be 1 less we have to destroy in the coming days. Work to break the system so we don't have death camps, but also work to slow it down as much as possible so we have less to fight to break the system.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Damn election season already?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (17 children)

    This is true. The problem is, in a lot of US elections, you only have bad choices. You have really bad, and a little less bad than really bad. What I wouldn't give for ranked choice voting.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    If I did something to prevent the fifty first death camp and you did nothing, I will sleep soundly.

    Show me a path to 0 death camps and I will work towards it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Time to vote for Jill stein I guess

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    That’s not the point. The point is to move toward a better party. On every vote you move towards a better outcome.

    The options at the moment are bad or total destruction. Let’s vote for bad so we have some chance to go for something better.

    All this argument you have does is make less people vote for so we move towards total destruction faster.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I wish it was possible to get lesser evilists to think rationally and critically examine their ideology, but they've so internalized their ideology as "rational" that they can't even recognize it as an ideology at all. They are exactly the sort of irrational, blind dogmatists they accuse everyone else of being.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›