First tool ban is here! A new law was just signed in New York that requires blueprint blocking technology on every CNC machine, laser cutter, lathe and 3D printer. This affects everyone who makes, builds or fixes things. This isn't a firearms law. It's a manufacturing law. And they buried it in the budget because they knew exactly what it was.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (13 children)

The state now controls the means of production?
Sounds dangerously Communist!

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 45 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Socialism for the rich, unions for the dogs and scraps for the rest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (11 children)

    Unions are for everyone, what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    How strong is your union compared to the police union?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    My what an unrelated and strangely slightly off-topic question. Whatever are you getting at?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not a native English speaker and not just sea lioning. Here is the break down for you:

    Socialism for the rich = subsidized losses for the rich, see every bailout for the past forever

    Unions for the dogs = police unions. Incredibly powerful unions that prevent cops from being held accountable in any way. They can kill a guy and the union will prevent them from being fired. All other unions are subject to union breaking efforts often by means of the police

    Scraps for the rest = you get nothing, you own nothing, your unions will be attacked by all means available

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    From the actual bill:

    HOWEVER, THAT IF THE WORKING GROUP DETERMINES THAT IT IS NOT TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE TO REQUIRE THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTERS SOLD IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO INCLUDE BLOCKING TECHNOLOGY, THE WORKING GROUP SHALL SO REPORT, AND NO REGULATIONS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE WORKING GROUP DETER- MINES THAT IT IS TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE.

    Considering the number of open source 3d printers, and mills, plus conversion packages for manual mills, It's ludicrous to assume it's feasible. And NY has nowhere near the manufacturing monopoly to force the rest of the country, let alone the world, to comply with a demand that all of them have blocking systems.

    Even given the safety check of a working group, this same bill also makes a stick illegal. So it's more than likely to fail on a few challenges, assuming it even makes it to final vote in this form.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    They start with closed source and will close the open source loop hole in a future bill. This is boiling frogs if anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    It's even better than that - for them.

    With this bill the legislation is effectively now on the books but in a dormant state where it can be selectively activated at any future time and with whatever scope the 'working group' decide.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I still don’t understand why they let budget bills get stuffed with unrelated laws. Seems like those should be separate bills, not hidden in must pass legislation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I try to consider what would happen if someone actually had the integrity to stand up to this shit.

    They'd get outed for holding back the budget. Media would be all over it framing them as being obstructionist.

    It'd require some balls and connection to the media to set the story straight.

    But it'd also require that they even know about what they're voting for. These kinds of changes are deliberately being shoveled onto the cart after train has started running. You'd have to hire a team to read everything as soon as it written and demand that changes are published before voting, which it is sometimes isn't, so this is something that also have to be addressed all the while the media is shooting at you.

    The best thing would be to allow a complete breakdown. Don't pass anything. See what happens and who the people support when they're hungry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Oooh, Louis Rossman is going to be PISSED * grabs popcorn *

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Even if something like this were to actually come to fruition, I have to imagine that all it would really result in is kind of like when the EU used to have less strict guidelines on wireless technologies and in America you could just flash the European firmware to get longer range. Surely there will just be a New York specific firmware and then you can flash the firmware from somewhere else.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›