I just recently stumbled on this and I've never heard anyone here that uses it. It looks quite interesting. A dash for your Proxmox server.

The live demo looks jammy: https://demo.proxcenter.io/

The docs look quite comprehensive: https://docs.proxcenter.io/

Github: https://github.com/adminsyspro/proxcenter-ui

Runs in a Docker container. There is an community version and an enterprise version. I think I'm going to bump this up the Projects list to the top.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago

    I heard you like containers so I put some docker in your prox mox so you can prox mox while you docker

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I don't use proxmox anymore, but it certainly needed a proper dashboard for basic metrics.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Why not? What did you move to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Proxmox has a lot of tools I don't need and I didn't like how proxmox manages storage. Now I use Incus, mostly because incus doesn't care about your storage back-end, networking, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    What's wrong with proxmox storage? Am I about to make a mistake?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Am I about to make a mistake?

    Probably not. I've been a longtime Linux user/admin and I like to get under the hood with storage and networking.

    Nothing wrong with proxmox at all, I used it for almost a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Most likely not. However, proxmox is a bit strict here and there on how it wants drives, networking and other stuff laid out. Also the hypervisor itself is quite strictly only for that. So, if you want to tinker with something without virtualization platform or use your drives for something else than just proxmox-installation it's likely not officially supported at least and might cause some headache or even bigger problems, like potentially losing data, if you run it in a way it's not meant to.

    However, if you just want a pretty capable hypervisor and run all your stuff on top of that it's perfectly fine, specially for hobbyists. For bigger enterprises it has some issues and management for a bigger server fleet, at least for now, isn't as polished as the 'big players' have, but, again, for home gamer it's pretty good solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    This looks really cool, but I wish that OIDC wasn't tied to an enterprise license that doesn't show a price (just a contact us form and email address) and requires annual renewal.

    I'd be willing to pay a reasonable one time fee to unlock OIDC support, and I understand why they charge a recurring fee for the other enterprise license features, but as it currently stands this doesn't really make sense for a home lab.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    You can do oidc with the proxmox ui itself.

    I use oidc with Incus, which is a fork of lxd and a similar software to proxmox, it can run vm's and lxd containers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yes I already do so, but this dashboard requires an enterprise license to also use OIDC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    https://sso.tax/

    It's unfortunately common, even though it probably shouldn't be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Agreed.

    I don't mind paying a reasonable price for access to SSO, especially if the service is fully provided by third-party infrastructure. For something that is fully self hosted on the other hand, a recurring cost for what should be a basic (or at most a one time reasonable fee) feature feels egregious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    It’s super douchey when people show their GitHub stars.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    How so? It's one of the things I check in addition to last update, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Douchey little popularity contests do not mean code is good. It’s misleading just like upvotes. It’s just what social media loving developers do. Most respectable (not all) projects avoid making a big deal out of it. It already shows it on GitHub. Why show it again? To be douchey?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago

    Hmmm

    do not mean code is good

    Doesn't mean it's bad either, but warrants checking out.

    • Amazon's Best Seller List
    • #1 rated truck by Consumer Reports
    • #5 in the Contemporary Jazz Soul charts
    • #1 rated NAS of 2026
    • Downloaded 5034 times

    I guess I just don't see it as douchey. To me is says, 'hey this might be worth checking out.' Besides Lemmy and a couple of long standing forums, I really don't do social media so perhaps I not as jaded.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)