Nobody who voted for Labour wanted this stupid, pointlessly cruel right-wing shit.

If they didn't like it when they heard the judgement, the government could have decided to change the law. They can't say "it was the Supreme Court, our hands are tied"; they're the government, and they have a majority. There was nothing in the King's Speech, so they have chosen to keep it as it is. This is the government's transphobia, not the Supreme Court's.

As well as the obviously horrible implications for trans people, the other predictable outcome of this is that cis women who don't look feminine/conforming enough will face shaming and violence from people who will see it as their right to enforce this ban.

So in a quest to ban something that has never caused an actual problem they just create a new one.

Women who have transitioned into becoming a man will now be forced to explain to everyone that they are biologically a woman when entering a toilet, and for me there is now a chance that the next time I'm stood at a urinal my neighbour will be a woman with a bigger knob than mine.

Meanwhile, actual sex offenders will continue to not be stopped from committing offences in toilets and changing rooms because of a little sign on the door

Rather than spend energy punching down trans people with this crap Labour could have acted swiftly to remove the ambiguity in the law. But they chose not to.

Why do you keep voting Labour when all your getting is Tories / Reform lite?

i cant emphasize enough how badly i want labour to get destroyed at the election.