91
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

After being excommunicated from the GOP, Geoff Duncan is trying for a comeback on the Democratic ticket

In the Georgia governor’s race, Geoff Duncan’s candidacy tests American politics as much as it tests his political appeal.

The former Republican lieutenant governor of Georgia is a current Democratic candidate for governor, with former Biden official and Atlanta ex-mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms currently holding the lead in Tuesday’s Democratic primary. A Republican is still favored to win, with billionaire Rick Jason up against the secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, and the lieutenant governor, Burt Jones.

Though his candidacy might not prove successful on 19 May, in offering himself to the public, Duncan is asking Democratic voters to consider what the off-ramp for Republican leaders should look like in the waning days of the Trump era. Can it be as simple as switching parties and rearranging one’s political values?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 17 hours ago

Or "I have no ideology and just want to stay in power"

[-] whyrat@lemmy.world 68 points 23 hours ago

Duncan is asking Democratic voters to consider what the off-ramp for Republican leaders should look like in the waning days of the Trump era.

I certainly don't trust them in any form of leadership. They need to find ways to make amends for the harm they caused before they should expect any level of power or responsibility given to them.

I hope GA can flip blue this cycle & stay there for 2028... But I've lost so much faith in the electorate I'll not hold my breath.

[-] human@slrpnk.net 40 points 23 hours ago

Prison. The off-ramp should be prison. There. Considered.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

And that's generous, given the typical punishment for treason

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Well Duncan, not electing people who supported Nazis sounds like a fucking good start

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah the republicans were terrible long before now

[-] etherphon@piefed.world 60 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Fuck. Off.

consider what the off-ramp for Republican leaders should look like in the waning days

How about fixing your own shit after you handed your party to insane assholes? This should not be allowed under any circumstances.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Also, how about he considers what's best for the country? Like, what, I'm supposed to care if a bunch of Republican leaders end up unemployed? Worse things happen to better people all the time in the world they have built.

[-] etherphon@piefed.world 4 points 20 hours ago

RIght? There is zero self awareness here. They admit they messed up but they still want to play? So they want a participation trophy is that it? That sounds pretty familiar. There was a big thing not too long ago about people who hated participation trophies, but I forgot who it was... oh yeah REPUBLICANS.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago

The off ramp looks like you retiring from politics and join the workforce. Use those bootstraps if you have to

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Seriously, them and all their rich friends can go give fancy speeches about nothing and raise money for museums or animal shelters for retired dressage horses or some other rich weirdo thing and that actually would be doing public service in a more real way than they ever have before

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 51 points 23 hours ago

For fucks sake....

When Republicans get "too extreme" the moderate ones need to stay over there and drag them back to the left some.

If they "become Dems" by slapping a D at the end of their name, they drag the Dem to the right.

Fuck this piece of shit and every other coward that's doing this.

All it does is move the Overton window right, we don't need another round of neoliberalism

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 46 points 23 hours ago

consider what the off-ramp for Republican leaders should look like in the waning days of the Trump era

It should look like retiring from politics. Y'all sunk your party, stay away from the others.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 24 points 22 hours ago

What’s to say he won’t flip back if elected?

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago

Just shows the Democrats are moved far enough to the right for these rats to join the ship.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

He won't get elected, it's a moot point.

A republican with a D by their name will never beat a Republican with an R by their name.

He's running in the dem primary because a progressive with a D by their name could beat a Republican in the general. Not saying they will, just that they'd have a chance.

And this asshole would rather have a foaming at the mouth maga win then a progressive. So he's running in the d primary to stop progress.

It's textbook neoliberalism. He's not trying to win the general, he's trying to break the only other option for it.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

I mean is there any difference.

[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 19 points 22 hours ago

“I think the audience of receptive Republicans is a lot bigger than what most folks would think in the Republican party,” Duncan said. “It’s not fun to have to defend Donald Trump.”

W.T.A.F?!

any time I think there just might be some minor redemption for these ghouls, their inner bootlicker congeals and oozes out of their putrid, flapping face-hole.

why did you defend this narcissistic, child raping, snake-oil pimping, murderous megalomaniac in the first place? it certainly wasn't fun for any of his victims for decades and isn't fun now. fuck all the way off, you useless sycophantic piece of shit.

[-] chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

fuck this coward

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Notice how the article subtly carries water for the liberals/fascists by only mentioning Bottoms (a liberal) as the opposition, while leaving out any progressive or leftist ones.

The effective opposition to the fascists would be somebody like Jason Esteves (of the candidates whose names I recognize, anyway), not Bottoms.

[-] Arrandee@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago

The “waning days” are not waning fast enough. Too much time will pass and we will forget all of these monstrous people did and said all those horrible things.

[-] brognak@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The off ramp for Republican leaders should be onto a gallows.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 22 hours ago

The offramp is to put your own party on trial for how heinous you have let it become.

[-] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Good luck. There is a strong blue voter base surrounding the counties outside of Atlanta that already have their ticket picked.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

politics

29802 readers
2196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS