True 'skeletonization' also includes the trimming away of any non-essential metal on the bridge, plate, wheel train or any other mechanical part of the watch, leaving only a minimalist 'bare' skeleton of the movement required for functionality.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 4 months ago (8 children)

This just maked me want to bring back clear-plastic electronics.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    🤩🤩🤩

    As a kid my friend who owned an N64 got to use the clear-green controller. The rest of us always had to wrestle it out for the other three opaque controllers based on how fucked up the joysticks were.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Not super interesting looking except for the visible antennas and connectors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I still think it looks interesting. But those are plastic cover panels underneath the clear plastic. You can see the screws through the back. So not quite the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    high-end watches are crazy. this is a 500 grand jacob & co astronomia:

    they have tons of these, all with free-floating three-axis tourbillions.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I never liked Jacod & Co, I don't find their watches useful at all. Imagine walking and your hand goes on the wall.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Back when my wife and i were dating I kept talking about wanting a skeleton watch, but I never thought to communicate what that was, and didn't know why she was always so profoundly unenthused by something I was showing interest in, it was unlike her. She was much happier about it when my folks got me one for x-mas and she found out it it was not, in fact, a watch decorated with skeletons, lmao.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I have one of the cheapest you can buy, a Relic. It’s been working great for me for over 10 years now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not sure if this counts or not, but Swatch has many lovely pieces that showcase the internal components, most of which go for under $300. This one has been my daily driver for about 18 months now

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    TIL there's a fancy name for "replacing the back plate with glass."

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I've never sesn a post that made me so ready to spend money before

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    could someone recommend a good cheap starter?

    I'm always over stimulated by the choice and want something nice and quality for the money.

    Is 200 too cheap?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Seiko makes excellent mechanical wrist watches. What is your intrigue? I'm assuming you like the idea of mechanical wrist watches and want a timepiece that is accurate and built to last. $200 is just a little below their entry price point I believe but you can always find used watches on eBay/Marketplace and the like. If you learn a little bit more about the industry then you might be able to find a bargain and get it serviced to work like new.

    I got extremely lucky when I was fixated on the idea of owning or restoring a mechanical watch when I learned that my grandfather left behind a 1930's Hamilton. Nothing super high end, but a watch that would probably go for $600 today and was my style. I find it hard to match my style today because it seems everyone is searching for a massive statement piece on their wrist. I just wanted a watch that ticks when its quiet, has character, and can be passed on to my own children.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    As a watch collector, they're usually on the cheap side. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but they're usually on the shitty side as well. Kind of like those weird ass knives at truck stops are basically Chinese pot metal crap, they just want someone to think they're cool who has no idea what they're buying.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe some, but can't you actually get one that's made well? I've seen a few for a couple hundred.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I have a few. They really run the gamut. I have some very nice pieces, and a handful of extremely cheap ones from Ali Express which, ironically enough, get more road time. Jaeger le coultre is kinda infamous for their skeleton guys, although known for being some what overpriced for the quality. You want to see a really cool one where the movement itself is built into the hands? Look up ulysse nardin freak.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    I've found plenty that are very nice quality. I mean like the decently good Bulova/Citizen kind of quality, and not the TAG Hauer / Breguet kind. But that's a pretty long way from shitty Chinesium. Although there's plenty of shitty watches of all kinds, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Okay neat but why? Does look practically to tell time. Reminds me the time the Fossil Watch store sold sundail watches.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Why is for aesthetics. I have a pocket watch like this. I think the gear work is beautiful in its own way, and the front of it is like any normal watch face (just with a transparent face so you can see behind it).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Seiko invented the self-winding watch, which has a big counterweight on the back, so as you moved around, the counterweight swung around, naturally winding the watch throughout your day. It was a notable innovation, and kind of confusing to describe, so Seiko put glass backings on their watches so you could watch the counterweight swing. I believe that was the event that made it a mainstream trend. Flashier brands like Seiko and Swatch were big fans of it, but higher end brands like Rolex and Breitling tend to avoid it to make a "We're not like the others" kinda statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Had one of these at one point. I enjoy the look.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    On top of what has already been said, some advice based on personal experience; if you plan to wear the watch, check what the watch face material is and avoid bio-ceramic. My first mechanical watch had a few big scratches within a few months which was kind of disappointing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I had a fake Breitling that was like that. It was so beautiful just watching the mechanism tick away.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Oh man, I love them. I have like 10 now and I need more.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Omg, where's the nsfw tag?!? /s

    unzips

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Have one and it's just incredible. Rather affordable too, if you have an interest in watches. Mine is a Seiko Presage cocktail time (blue) and it's going strong for almost 8 years now. Its very well built

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    That really cool

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›