123

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/49178

Why They Don’t Want You Driving a Chinese Car

I took my first ride in a Chinese car recently. Not in the U.S., of course, since sky-high tariffs have made them almost impossible to import. I was visiting family in the U.K., and we rented a BYD Sealion SUV. And let me tell you: I saw immediately why American car companies are desperate to have these things kept out of this country. It was elegantly designed, incredibly comfortable, and a smooth ride.


From blog via This RSS Feed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Because they want you to be a fucking debt slave and die penniless.

(That's why they're bragging about how well credit card companies are doing right now.)

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

Here’s the thing, with some of the new tech they are mandated on putting it cars (look up DMS and the 2021 Infrastructure Act) I’m not sure we are going to be able to avoid being spied on so I don’t really care who gets to do it. At least the Chinese market isn’t going to send Trumps gestapo after me because I said I don’t like fascists. I don’t like the slave labor aspect of the Chinese productions for sure and would avoid that. But given the state of the American car market I don’t give car if it’s made and or subsidized in china. A 22k car that fully charges in 10 min sounds like a dream right about now. The quicker we get away from fossil fuels the better.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, before the orange bastard came back, I would have absolutely defended the choice to not allow import of Chinese EVs for specifically privacy concerns and the Chinese government having access to my location and habits. Now? Fuck it. I don't even care anymore. I'm more concerned about the domestic threat to even give a shit.

[-] commander@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

2020 plain clothes federal agents kidnapping people to makeshift prisons and the none of that really being addressed should have been an ey opening for people to view their greatest threat being the government they live under. Same with the Snowden leaks and rather than that becoming illegal, much of of progressively becoming legal going forward. Maybe some even made retroactively legal

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Amen brother.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago

Lemme guess "because they're better than American cars"

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 4 hours ago

And exponentially more affordable.

Stern says her first reaction to driving the car was “holy crap,” and she “I fell for the SU7 Max inside and out, and now I’m left wanting what I can’t have.” She was impressed with the way its infotainment system integrated with a phone, the between-seat minifridge, the karaoke system, the walkie-talkie system, the driver-assistance system, the range, and the comfort. “I fell in love with all things about this car, including its price tag,” she said, noting that it was a better experience than a similarly priced Tesla. The Xiaomi, she says, is not even in the same universe as American cars. “It’s like if Apple had actually built the long-rumored Apple Car and everything just… worked.” “I will wait for you, Xiaomi,” she concludes. “We shall be together again one day.” One is relieved the Journal took her car away before things between them got too physical.

And if Stern sounds like lovesickness may have compromised her judgment, consider this: the CEO of Ford himself drives one. "I don't like talking about the competition so much,” he admitted to a podcaster, “but I drive the Xiaomi… I don’t want to give it up.” Noting that the car is “fantastic,” he told a company board member that the Chinese auto industry is an “existential threat.”

American manufacturers are terrified of the Chinese auto industry, because Chinese cars are good, and they’re cheap. Their executives admit as much, saying that “the arrival of affordable, high-tech Chinese cars could upend” the industry. So they’re trying to ensure not only that Chinese cars can’t be sold in the U.S., but that Americans will never even be exposed to one. A group of Congressional Democrats recently sent Donald Trump a letter pleading with him to ensure Chinese cars never enter the United States. Supposedly progressive Democratic congressman Ro Khanna has been particularly aggressive in pushing for new rules, claiming the cars “put Americans at risk.” “Chinese cars are a serious threat to America’s national security and Michigan’s economic security,” Senator Elissa Slotkin has said. Astonishingly, even though the Biden administration already “imposed sweeping regulations that effectively ban Chinese automakers from ​selling passenger vehicles in the United States,” lawmakers are now trying to ensure that people can’t even drive Chinese cars across the border to visit the United States. They apparently envision an absurd scenario where agents at the Mexico border inspect every car to ensure it’s not Chinese before it’s even allowed to drive on U.S. soil. One problem is that U.S. manufacturers have focused on (deadly, inefficient) large SUVs and trucks, and the average new car now costs around $50,000. Car prices hit a record last year, and American auto loan debt hit a record $1.68 trillion, leaving many Americans with “more and more of their paychecks eaten by their car payments.” There are almost no new cars for sale under $20,000. But Chinese cars can sell new for as little $8,000 in China itself, and China may well be able to offer cars in the U.S. close to $20,000 new—if it’s allowed to compete. That’s why the industry sees Chinese cars as an existential threat: they worry that consumers will prefer them, and so the power of the government must be used to ensure that consumers are forced against their will to buy more expensive, lower-quality cars, in order to prop up the U.S. automotive industry. (They’ll say that’s about Jobs, of course, but it’s also about profits.)...

But wait! There's more! The article deserves a full read.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

It's all about the "national car manufacturers profit security". Nothing more, nothing less.

[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 127 points 15 hours ago

I'm in IT and personally I'd genuinely like to see a "grey hat" examination of the internet traffic they send/receive before I'm ready to listen to a car reviewer giving reviews on how nice the seats are or charging is.
The fact that I work in IT is also why my home is secured with security doors and deadbolts.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

And don't drive any vehicle made in the US in the last 15years?

[-] alpha1beta@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago

Even if they prove there's nothing bad happening, I will never ever, trust them not to change that, very suddenly. They could love to have 100M American cars they can brick the moment a U.S. President says "Taiwan is a country"

But hell, I'm in the market for a car and I'm spending more time researching how to remove the LTE than on milage or features. I'd rather drive a go-cart down I-95 in rush hour than have my car selling everywhere I go, or tracking how many times I hit "next track"

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Just remove the fuse, or if the fuse is tied to other components and you don’t care to ever reenable the LTE, remove the antenna. Just keep in mind that removing the antenna can permanently damage the unit.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 12 hours ago

You can safely assume that everything that goes through the car's computer is sent to the manufacturer, no difference if it's Tesla, BYD or BMW

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 hours ago

They all do it, but at the very least, European manufacturers are liable for GDPR violations for cars being used in the EU.

I was sent a tiktok link by someone recently so I opened it and this is what they have showing on their website:

Remote-access “transfers of EEA User Data to China”: Update on Irish GDPR decision

In April 2025, the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) found that TikTok had not complied with GDPR requirements in relation to transfers of some "EEA User Data to China by way of remote access". The DPC ordered TikTok to bring its transfers into compliance within 6 months, failing which they must be suspended. TikTok strongly disagrees with the DPC's decision and is appealing through the Irish courts. The High Court of Ireland has paused the decision while that happens, allowing the transfers to continue for now.

They straight up don't give a fuck, they'll just continue doing what they're doing and appeal it through the courts.

What happens if they do lose? They'll just close down their European operations and leave a huge sign blaming the GDPR and people will complain until they get special privileges. Because as a Chinese company, they can easily afford to lose a huge market like Europe.

BYD, Geely, etc can do the same. China's got enough leverage on us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 14 hours ago

It's worth looking into how much data modern US cars are gathering as well, if you're concerned with that. Frankly, it seems like you're just deciding who gets your data at a certain point.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago

It’s worth looking into how much data modern US cars are gathering as well

Well known.

Location & Movement: Real-time GPS coordinates, route history, frequently visited destinations (like home or work), and travel times.

Driving Behavior: Speed, harsh braking, rapid acceleration, steering angles, and how often you engage safety features like lane-keep assist.

Vehicle Telematics: Odometer readings, tire pressure, battery/fuel levels, diagnostic trouble codes, and maintenance needs.

Infotainment & Syncs: Call logs, text messages, contact lists, and connected music or app preferences. Some systems use voice recognition and record conversations.

Biometrics & Cabin Monitoring: Cabin microphones, seat sensors (which register your weight), and cameras that track eye and head movements for fatigue.

External Cameras: 360-degree cameras, dashcams, and automated parking sensors that catalog the physical environment around your vehicle.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/how-figure-out-what-your-car-knows-about-you-and-opt-out-sharing-when-you-can

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 39 points 13 hours ago

As a Canadian who holds negative views of both the American and Chinese governments, I think to myself: which am I more likely to visit someday and will therefore have the opportunity to stick me in an ICE detention center when they look up my profile to discover that? Which of the two governments is a more direct threat to my own country's security and sovereignty?

I get an answer that would perhaps surprise Americans.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 8 hours ago

I think to myself: which am I more likely to visit someday

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the answer was China for quite a few people.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

It's mainly a question of proximity. The United States is right next door, China is across the Pacific. And I'm not really in a business where I'd need to travel there for professional reasons either.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

No one trusts the Chinese. Do we trust the Germans? Certainly the level of trust in the Americans has fallen based on the Donny the Demented storm trooper state. The Chinese play a long game where the free marketeers play short term profits and it’s obvious that they have produced a black swan.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] Delascas@feddit.uk 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I drive an MGS5 EV - MG is a British brand, but it's manufactured by SAIC Motors. Every bit a Chinese company. I traded a VW ID.4 for it . . and WHAT AN UPGRADE. Better across the board - faster charging, longer real world range, much, MUCH better software . . . all for 25% less than the ID.4.

Jim Farley is right to be terrified . . . Both the American and the German legacy car companies are screwed.

[-] AlJones@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

the headlights can project movies

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

unironically yes. I saw a Sony? branded EV with a long thin screen on the front bumper playing Ghost of Yotai trailers.

[-] AlJones@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/huawei-unveils-car-that-can-project-movies-with-its-headlights/

Huawei cars dont have a screen on the front. They project the movie out of the headlights.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 34 points 15 hours ago

They're cheap because BYD received about $1.86 billion dollars in government subsidies last year.

Like in other sectors, they flood the market with cheap goods to put competitors out of business. Then they're the only car company in town and they have you by the balls.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 4 hours ago

https://brandsownedby.com/who-owns-byd/

For public reasons.

Guess who subsidizes US car manufacturers, and guess how much they cost. Or rta.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago

US automakers have received $85 Billion in taxpayer money since 2008.

So where are the $20,000 cars?

[-] RmDebArc_5@feddit.org 32 points 15 hours ago

Many countries subsidiese their car brands. In Germany exact numbers are not known, because the government works for the companies I guess, but most experts assume that brands like Volkswagen receive about 1 billion euros (or 1.15 billion US dollars) a year. Source A Source B. I'm no expert for other countries, but a quick research lead to the claim that until 2015 Tesla and the adjacent businesses (SpaceX etc.) had received 4.9 billion US dollars in subsidies Source. I don't think its fair to say that they are cheap just because they receive subsidies, they are just getting what everyone else is.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

they are just getting what everyone else is.

Not really. European countries usually subsidize purchasing EVs. China subsidizes manufacturing them, including for foreign markets.

If you buy a Chinese EV, it still get a subsidy from your own government too (if it still has such a program - mine does not), not just the Chinese one.

From the article about BYD:

The subsidy figure was first highlighted by investment researcher AJ Investment Research (@alojoh) on X, and the payments were attributed to “Government subsidy related to daily activities.”

From your first article about VW (I used google translate, let me know if it got anything wrong, mein Deutsch ist sehr schlecht):

According to my research, the Volkswagen Group has received €9.1 billion in subsidies over the past eight years. Of this, €6.4 billion came from direct funding, including for research in the areas of drive systems and digital technology. €2.4 billion came from the environmental bonus – subsidies for the purchase of electric cars – and €300 million from tax breaks.

So we don't know what BYD's true equivalent for the €6.4 billion (over 8 years) number is. They get grants for building manufacturing plants and such too. But here's what we do know: their equivalent for VW's €2.4 billion (over 8 years) is that $1.86 billion dollar figure (for one year). That's the subsidies for actually manufacturing and selling cars. And crucially, since that €2.4 billion (again, over 8 years) was from purchase subsidies, that means BYD cars are eligible for those too, that's not a VW-specific subsidy. Unless Germany has rules saying EV buyers only get subsidies for buying German EVs, but I don't know that they do.

Basically, China pays BYD 2-3k (IIRC) to build an EV and then Germany pays you 3-6k to buy an EV, while China also has significantly cheaper labour. BYD's average salary (including everyone from factory workers to engineers and executives) was 1500 EUR per month in 2025, from their own financial reports (total cost divided by head count). That includes taxes, benefits, etc. Now consider what a factory worker makes in Germany and then also consider what engineers make in Germany. According to this article, the LOWEST in-house employment contract VW has, was 2400 EUR per month in 2024. There are also allegations of 7 day work weeks in BYD's Hungarian plant, but those might be from a biased source.

[-] RmDebArc_5@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

I had a look at the original report by BYD as the site linked by the other commenter didn't include the information and seemed AI generated (some numbers were actually a bit of, though not by much). According to it the 1.86$ billion are the only directly paid subsidies BYD received in 2025. All other subsidies were loans with favorable conditions, which aren't directly relevant (The report is 300+ pages long I may have missed something) Source. Currently Germany supports all EV purchase, so the 2.4$ billion should not be counted, but according to the BAFA this is planned/considered to be made exclusive to EU made cars. Source (German). The 6.4$ billion should IMO be counted against the 1.86$ billion as they are both direct founding, and apparently the only direct. While a bit lower this still places VW in the about a billion dollar (925$ million). Additionally, even though the subsidies are universal the EU has placed a tariff on Chinese EVs since 2024 that ranges from 27%-47% depeding on the manufacturer. Source. The working conditions and wages at BYD are of course lower than at VW, even if this is partially countered by the lower standard of living in China, however we don't no how much of the final car the companies actually produce (how much of it is done by them and not just bought premade, likely in China).

Anyway I don't think this comparison could ever be 100% fair as China and Germany have different economic models, Germany already established its car industry while Chinas is still relatively up and coming etc. I do however think that it is not accurate to say "they are cheaper because government subsidies" as there are many more factors.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 4 hours ago

Chinese wages are expensive enough that Western companies are preferring outsourcing labor elsewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 14 hours ago

"They"

the big "they"

Hate that shit in a headline.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
123 points (87.7% liked)

Technology

84603 readers
4228 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS