▲ 112 ▼ Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare (www.eff.org) submitted 5 months ago by mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au 4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children) And if the (un)lawful access bs gets rightly shot down, they will try again and again and again permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (2 children) That's the problem with this shit. It takes a major effort to get the electorate to oppose this shit but the people lobbying for it just go back to work on Monday and have another crack at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] core@leminal.space 4 points 5 months ago There should be a rule that if a bill loses by like 80%-85%, legislators have to wait 5 years before retrying. permalink fedilink source parent [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago I know it's so exhausting permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (2 children) That's the problem with this shit. It takes a major effort to get the electorate to oppose this shit but the people lobbying for it just go back to work on Monday and have another crack at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] core@leminal.space 4 points 5 months ago There should be a rule that if a bill loses by like 80%-85%, legislators have to wait 5 years before retrying. permalink fedilink source parent [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago I know it's so exhausting permalink fedilink source parent
[–] core@leminal.space 4 points 5 months ago There should be a rule that if a bill loses by like 80%-85%, legislators have to wait 5 years before retrying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago I know it's so exhausting permalink fedilink source parent
all 4 comments