154

PieFed has done it once again, this time adding 'warning' labels for opposing ideological perspectives, well at least one; Can't find any warnings for fascism or capitalism 🤔

This can be demonstrated here: https://piefed.social/c/globalnews/p/1697164/sudan-civil-war-spills-over-into-neighboring-chad-peoples-dispatch

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think Rimu has tied this warning to the peoplesdispatch.org domain. I think this is a custom thing he did to his instance, because I didn’t find it in the PieFed codebase. ~~[ETA: it is in the codebase, in a separate repo].~~ [ETA: I’m told that no specific site warnings are baked into the code, just the feature is. For site blocks, there is an optional default list of domains, which I’m told contains only far-right/fascist sites.]

I don’t think People’s Dispatch is even Marxist-Leninist. I think it’s an international anti-imperialist media site. But I wouldn’t assume Rimu could explain the difference or care that there is one. Maybe all anti-imperialists are tankies to him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

Will they have a warning label for Zionist outlets?

Nah but they have some for theintercept and electronicintifada ...

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 26 points 1 week ago

Unsurprisingly not currently. Based on current behavior and responses doubtful in future

https://lemmy.ml/comment/25577925

load more comments (1 replies)

Are you sure this is a "warning"? /s

Sounds like an indicator of quality, instead. Even the icon is in red, the color of hope.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 week ago

The whole piefed thing has to be a bit right?

[-] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago

All the bullshit they say about silencing and 1984 is as always, a classic case of projection.

Please enlighten us on where we should be getting the full objective unbiased reality from, the New York Times maybe? God forbid a media takes a pro working class / global south bias instead of the usual neoliberal status quo ideology. Call them out on it and they'll deny they even follow any ideology, they're just being Objective™.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 39 points 1 week ago

Two years ago, Lemmy.world tried a similar move with their MediaBiasFactCheck bot. It was soundly rejected by the community, and they finally relented after weeks of outcry. Why is @Rimu putting us through this again?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago

It's right in the name. Fed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] iso@lemy.lol 28 points 1 week ago

If I hadn't given the instance to someone else, I would have considered leaving a community note on Rimu's user page with a red exclamation mark saying "this user is a complete idiot".

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
154 points (95.8% liked)

Fediverse

24882 readers
8 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS