all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 4 months ago (8 children)

lol. you're leaving for the outages?

i left the day microslop bought it. i didn't delete my repos... but I switched to using gitlab and now codeberg

I'm actually surprised to hear about the outages. i thought they were reliable....

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    This chart shows the problem fairly well. (Even if the scale is set to make a point)

    Source: https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

    Forced to use GitHub Professional and lost count how often GitHub is just standing in my way with things not responding often times without any error message.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    I'll share more details about where the Ghostty project will be moving to in the coming months. We have a plan but I'm also very much still in discussions with multiple providers (both commercial and FOSS).

    • GitLab -> too enterprisey, danger of enshittification, if not already there
    • SourceHut -> too different
    • BitBucket -> lol
    • Codeberg -> GitHub without the bullshit
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I hope it's Codeberg. I think it's a fork of gitea. And gitea can be migrated to Forgejo, which is working on federation. So I can have my server, pull code to it, work on it and for a PR to your server. No more needing accounts everywhere. And the federation well be ActivityPub powered!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    If we're not considering self-hosting:

    • GitLab - asks for phone number/cc to create an account, enterprise-level UI (in a bad way)
    • SourceHut - free (during public alpha that might end one day), ran by a controversial figure
    • BitBucket - "Code and CI/CD, powered by AI"
    • Codeberg - limited to FOSS projects, fork of Gitea, CI is compatible with GH actions

    I moved all my active and new projects to Codeberg the moment GitHub started pushing their Copilot crap everywhere. I just knew nothing good would come from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Codeberg / Forgejo and Tangled are my favorite options. Tangled because while it is VC backed, the open source and federated model are well thought out. If you haven’t read the source code I highly recommend it, it’s genius.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Bitbucket/Stash is so bad, man. My org uses it, probably bc they got a good deal with it as part of Atlassian suite and it just makes everything less convenient than it has to be, from keys to collaborator permissions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    They have the kind of hate one can only have for something they used to love.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    I tried to read this using Tor Browser and I can't:

    Failed to verify your browser Code 99 Vercel Security Checkpoint

    Thanks Vercel Security Checkpoint! You've saved the Internet yet again!

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Im not in the scene but I do hate microslop, can you transfer your history and such that it is seamless?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Has anyone compiled a list of where projects are moving to? I know many linux desktop applications are self hosting on gitlab, but i’ve also seen gitea and codeberg. If anyone has opinions about a preference, do comment. I have been enjoying self hosting gitea for my simple personal projects and for deploying simple web apps, all on $5 vps.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    I would expect Gitlab and Codeberg to be the most likely destinations depending on how FOSSy a project is.
    I heard someone mention "Tangled" earlier today too which might be new? Unsure. Seems to be an attempt at a federated version control platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    Microslop and the mierda touch.

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 4 months ago
    [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    I just backed up all my repos and plan on fully migrating to selfhosted Forgejo. GitHub is rapidly going downhill. Recently they had a bug that was silently corrupting people's main branches, and they're getting more trigger happy on the ban hammer.

    One of my friends just had their entire 14 year account history wiped without any warning for supposedly misusing GitHub Actions (most likely an AI false positive), and they're just getting all their tickets immediately closed.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Damn, I also want to move away (to codeberg), but it seems that they don't have cross-repository code search (at least I failed to find one), which is one of my most used GitHub features. Like "lang:nix some-service-name" to see how people configure a specific service. Is there any way to achieve a similar thing on codeberg?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You don't need to host your code on github to search the projects hosted there. You just need an account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I mean yeah, but then people who search in a similar way would not be able to find my configs for reference, and that seems unfair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Simple solution is to have another remote on github and push there so it's searchable to others but handle PRs, issues and releases on codeberg. People are not leaving github because there's some issue with hosting code there. The issue are with the development process.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Well, that's quite ironic, because their fiscal sponsor and biggest donor (in both directions) is "Hack Club", which insists you use GitHub and Figma everywhere and lies to you about deleting your data (source: me, you will have to take my word for it).

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I'll share more details about where the Ghostty project will be moving to in the coming months. We have a plan but I'm also very much still in discussions with multiple providers (both commercial and FOSS).

    For the people, like me, who were wondering where they were going next.

  • source