all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 5 months ago (1 child)

If Waymo doesn't respect the Social Contract like this, they shouldn't expect it to be available to them. It should be open season on Waymo sabotage/destruction. Human lives are more valuable that Waymo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago

    Then it should be unrealistic to expect they are allowed to operate, frankly

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    If they can't follow the law then why the fuck would they be allowed on the road?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I guess bicyclists not carrying sawed off shot guns to shoot at robot murder cars is also unrealistic.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    😅

    Waymo, the autonomous driving tech firm whose so-called ‘robo-taxis’ are now roaming the streets of London, has told cycling campaigners that expecting their driverless cars to respect cycle lanes is “too high a bar” – because their customers want to be dropped off in them.

    This is in Europe mate. London to be precise. Not the US. People don't casually carry guns around here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Things can change.

    Didn't used to be robot murder cars on the road either.

    Maybe crossbows, aim at the tires? Sorry: tyres.

    Maybe some kind of light that is extremely bright in a particular wavelength, that blinds their cameras and sends them into an emergency halt mode?

    But anyway lol, sawed off shotguns are extremely illegal in all the US as well... I guess the analogy was lost in translation =P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    High powered lasers that can burn a hole in the sensor aren't too hard to get ahold of. A sticker slapped over one could probably work just as well though, and there's more plausible deniability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    ... I was thinking more like an IR/UV floodlight, than a laser.

    Less chance of accidentally blinding someone.

    Granted, you'd have to figure out a frequency range that would be 'super effective' against particular cameras, but... I would feel bad about accidentally giving someone a non consensual amateur lasik surgery.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago

    Maybe.. driverless vehicle are unrealistic then?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    I guess we just have to expect to be killed by Waymo. /s

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    We were promised these things would be better, and safer than human drivers. Now, even with the assistance of remote human drivers, they can't follow the law?

    No, you don't get to move the goal posts and say we should still accept them because they don't drive any worse than humans. If that's the new standard then what the fuck do we need these things for? What is their purpose, but to take jobs?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Cities that want to keep cars out of bike lanes should keep all cars out of them, autonomous or not, by ticketing them. But they don't, so taxis and delivery drivers stop in them. That's traffic enforcement's fault.

    Given that human drivers stop in bike lanes, Waymo then has a tradeoff:

    1) Be the only ones to follow the letter of the law, break a lot of people's expectations, and catch backlash for disrupting traffic.

    2) Follow the most common expectation, even if wrong, and incrementally add to the problem.

    IMO, cyclists shouldn't lobby Waymo directly, but should lobby cities to actually enforce the rules on everyone. Then Waymo would fall in line naturally. And if they're inclined to take direct action against Waymo's they should also act against Uber and DoorDash drivers who are a far bigger problem by volume (and wait time for deliveries).

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    The article is a steaming pile of garbage. I was ready to hate on Waymo, but the article is conflating what happened in the US with whatever might or might not happen in the UK.
    It's pretty obvious the AVs need to observe the traffic rules, otherwise they will be fined into oblivion and have their licence revoked. The click bait worked.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Expecting bricks to stay out of Waymo's windshields is unrealistic

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Waymo now fucked across most continents. Shoots self in both feet.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    As a biker, I carry a rusty old giant foot long flatheaded screwdriver.

    Fuck cops. Law isn't real. Neither help or protect anyone, like the military, beyond a shitty pretending show, like Pleasantville.

  • source
  • In the provided preview picture, isn't that Abbey road where the Beatles took their famous album cover picture where they cross the street?

    It absolutely is!

  • source