top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 145 points 4 months ago (1 child)

My mother was actually thinking about selling my grandparents house to them.

I'm not sure if I changed her mind, but I straight up told her the second she mentioned them that I would burn the house down before the sale went through and would be chilling in a cell with a smile on my face for it.

She decided not to sell to a company.

Does that make me unhinged? Maybe. But that's one less house going to a rental company and one more family getting a house they'll live in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 117 points 4 months ago (16 children)

    Make a secondary house all but impossible to own via property tax, and make it illegal for corporations to own property. Watch housing cost plummet through the floor.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    and make it illegal for corporations to own property.

    You are asking to make corporations illegal which I am admittedly in favor of but don't think that's what you were going for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    100%. Right now you can write your empty property off on your taxes as a loss in most places*

    *In the US

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Oh not only can you, it's encouraged. I see libs talking on Reddit about how it's actually better than renting because you take on a risk when renting and an empty house builds value and doesn't run the chance of damage.

    This is of course why private property sucks, but if the general populous can't stomach that, I'd be willing to settle for georgism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    The issue is that they're already doing this with HOAs. They don't care if they owne your house, but they own the dirt under it and can evict you for bullshit reasons. Make corporate HOAs illegal too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Make corporate HOAs illegal

    FTFY

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I was waiting for this comment, and it's the reason I framed it this way. Because an HOA done right is pretty much a commune. You can chose the membership terms, penalties, and organization scope.

    I've seen some where not paying your dues simply locks you out of amenities like pool access, and that's it. So it's kind of what you make it. Doesn't have to be the nightmare most deal with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    That could be handled with a communal spaces, a HOA tends to end run by the "Karens" trying to micromanage everyone, and the boys who think they're Wyatt Earp running around enforcing stuff.

    There's no excuse for meddling in the affairs of your neighbor, unless what they are doing is literally dangerous, as much as a flamingo in the yard pains me to see it doesn't actually hurt me.

    Same to say my raised beds don't hurt anyone, breaking the boring theme of crappy lawns isn't reason to tack notices to the door, and a lot of them will attack people near the HOA not just the ones in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    I mean a lot of what BlackRock sells is index funds like vanguard etc.

    That's a lot of people's retirements more than it's private equity.

    I think you'll have more luck changing the rules of the game rather than chasing the players. If black rock disappeared tomorrow all that money would just move to another ETF manager and you would instantly have another BlackRock.

    Also I think BlackRock (which is far from blameless in a whole lot of affairs) gets confused with black stone. It was the latter more directly investing in real estate iirc.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Also what i find very interesting about this topic is how demographics plays into this

    i personally think that the UN predictions about how the population numbers are going to evolve are utter bullshit. it is well known that the population pyramid looks something like this:

    and it's going to get thinner and thinner at the bottom as time progresses.

    anyways, i think a lot of organizations that could build housing are a bit reluctant mostly for that reason. a company thinks "if i build a house today, there's a good chance that there won't be demand for that house in 30 years, so it might not pay off". and municipalities, i'm afraid, are way too under-invested in building social housing in general because that would be communism or sth.

    after a quick search on the internet, about 1.6 million people live in public housing in the US in 2024. that's about 0.5 percent. Source

    Meanwhile in Europe, about 9.3% (45 million people) people live in public housing according to this article, with some countries like Austria having 24%. (8% of EU according to this OECD study).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Blackstone. Everyone blames BlackRock, but it's Blackstone doing this. BlackRock is maybe a little bit evil, but mostly they sell ETFs, so ways for retail investors to invest in the stock market indexes. They make a fee off that, and at their size that's a huge amount of money already. Blackstone is more active about what it invests in, it strategically buys up neighborhoods so they can unilaterally raise rents. Among all kinds of other morally dubious investments.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 13 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I used to dream of owning a small shack to live in but now I truly don't give a fuck, I'm soon to be homeless and no longer care about society

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Rente "nur noch als Basisabsicherung" und dann an der Börse zocken mit unseren Rentengeldern, dann kann sich Blackrock schön die Taschen voll machen (sein ehemaliger Arbeitgeber). Ansonsten noch der Ausverkauf Deutschland's, Kaputtstreichen der Krankenversicherung, das ständigen Hetzen gegen die eigene Bevölkerung usw usf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Pensions "only as basic security" and then gambling on the stock market with our pension money, then BlackRock (his former employer) can line its pockets nicely. Otherwise, there's the sell-off of Germany, the dismantling of health insurance, the constant vilification of the population, etc., etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›