86
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 hour ago

Fair enough. Then so was Charlie Kirk.

Oh, not like that, huh?

[-] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 2 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

A man under a tent with the words prove me wrong written on it while arguing against gun control getting shot was definitely the definition of asking for it.

[-] Neon_Carnivore@lemmy.zip 1 points 25 minutes ago

OMG! Mike Johnson raped the Pope?!?

/s

[-] BigMacHole 15 points 2 hours ago

We HATE the Pope!

-People who want the Bible to be Law!

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 56 minutes ago

What you’re missing is that evangelicals think the Catholic Church is demonic.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 52 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Mike Johnson is not Catholic. He's a Christian Nationalist Protestant Evangelical piece of shit. They don't even have to pretend to give a fuck about the Pope.

[-] ryokimball@infosec.pub 54 points 3 hours ago

The pope shouldn't have been dressed like that.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago

Such a sexy dress, he made Mike fail his mastorbation pact.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago

same with that dude hes always talking about. Blessed are the peacemakers. Shut the fuck up and stay in your lane. BE-AUGH-TCH!

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

Leo needs to call that punk ass out and show him how Chicago deals with Antichrists

Some years ago I would have laughed at the idea that the pope could be on any side of this but the wrong side. Then I found out just how stupendously, stupidly evil evil can get. I'm not laughing now.

[-] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 hours ago

Mike Johnson is such a cowardly fucking liar

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 hours ago

Are we gonna kill the Pope?

[-] CuddlesMcBubblefun@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

I mean, the DoD literally threatened exactly that

[-] Stormy 4 points 3 hours ago
[-] CuddlesMcBubblefun@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Undersecretary Elbridge Colby summoned the Papal Nuncio to the Pentagon, said the pope better get in line with Trump, and referenced the "Avignon Papacy", a historical event where France kidnapped and killed the pope then set up a puppet Papacy.

Edit: Looking into it, the original story came from "anonymous Vatican sources", and has since been officially denied by both sides.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

January 2026.

The DoD held a meeting with Vatican officials where they threatened them, saying the US has the military power to "do whatever it wants" and that the "Church had better take its side"

[-] Stormy 2 points 2 hours ago

There was so much going on then, I must have missed this. This is insane

[-] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago

Again? I don't think they'll let Vance in now.

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Lots of folks are calling him turbulent

[-] Vanderdeckenscopilot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

These guys messing with the Pope is hilarious. I dont even do religion and I know this is gonna be fun. Are they going for the Henry the 8th method?

[-] baeb66@lemmy.today 5 points 2 hours ago

I thought they were reactionaries in the "bring back the 1950's" sense, but they really want to bring back the 1500's. Mike is going to post his theses on supply side economics and neocon warfare on the front door of the St Louis Cathedral in NOLA.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I thought they were reactionaries in the "bring back the 1950's" sense, but they really want to bring back the 1500's.

Always have been. The notion that "conservatives" wanted to "conserve" anything but oligarchy (or literal monarchy, if they can get away with it) has never been anything but a lie to swindle the rubes.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
86 points (97.8% liked)

politics

29385 readers
2711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS