517
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] homes@piefed.world 91 points 3 days ago

Does that mean the Corporation for Public Broadcasting will suddenly come back into being? Hooray?

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

Can’t unhang an innocent body.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago
[-] xSikes@feddit.online 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Here’s the NPR link:

Judge says Trump violated free speech when he ordered defunding of NPR

https://www.npr.org/2026/03/31/nx-s1-5768399/npr-pbs-trump-federal-funding

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Can't wait for the inevitable supreme court decision that says "it's ok if Trump does it"

[-] No1@aussie.zone 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Murdoch is going to hate this.

His mouthpieces and minions have also been campaigning for ages to get rid of the UK's BBC and Australia's ABC.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Damn without the ABC how would we got told Israel is defending itself from the violent Gazans and have washed up comedians on game shows.

SBS isn’t too bad tho.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

The rule used to be "ABC for national news, SBS for international news".

Murdoch stooges have been appointed to chair the ABC recently and funding cuts have been ripping it to shreds over the years. It's an abomination that 4 corners - a program that must have caused more Royal Commissions than anything else - doesn't even have funds to run a full season throughout the year.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It’s not just Murdoch however, the politicalisation of the channel is apparent. It follows the same neoliberal western propaganda playbook as the government wants.

Labor could have made changes, they haven’t. I’ve submitted multiple complaints in the past year and they blow them off. They don’t care, they have a national agenda to push.

SBS seems to hold a bit more independence in not toeing the party line, which is what makes them tolerable.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago
[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Unironically one of the worst human beings in history.

He has some stiff competition for that title, though: his father and his son.

[-] jason@discuss.online 16 points 3 days ago

Let's. Fuckin. Go.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Why isn't this cross posted to uplifting news?

[-] thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip 44 points 3 days ago

Because: just because a judge told them to do or not to do something, doesn't mean the Republican administration will follow the judgement.

It will very appreciated uplifting news when funding is restored.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Also, let's not forget...

Fully staffed organizations of skilled and experienced people don't just HAPPEN. The people who made NPR and PBS what it was? A huge number of them have now moved on and are not coming back. This isn't "evil has been defeated", this is "the slow process of rebuilding can start with underpaid employees sitting under the sword of Damacles."

It's not "back to what it was last year". It's "maybe in 10 years we MIGHT get back a functioning organization like we had a year ago."

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 3 days ago
[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Yep. As usual. Mission has already been accomplished. But I'm sure there will be severe punishments for breaking the law. 100% sure. So totally sure. Positive.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

They will have a sternly worded letter in their future for sure.

The issue is this is a text book example of why an emergency injunction is needed, but the states is not a place that makes sense anymore so now its all just yapping well after the fact.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
517 points (99.8% liked)

politics

29221 readers
2207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS