On March 20th, 2026 MSI released a BIOS update for B650 Tomahawk Wi-Fi motherboard. One of the changes says "Implemented the anti-cheat mechanism."

I looked around their forums and people seem to agree that it refers to Microsoft Pluton security processor.

Does anybody know what this change is actually about? Is it another initiative by Microsoft to further lock people out of their computers? Would it somehow hinder using Linux with this motherboard?

A screenshot from MSI website showing the description of a BIOS update. One of the mentioned changes is "Implemented the anti-cheat mechanism."

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 6 months ago (14 children)

https://www.riotgames.com/en/news/vanguard-security-update-motherboard

I am so deeply annoyed that

  1. Vanguard demands this level of control over user systems

  2. Vanguard seems to be the only entity handling a threat vector most people simply ignore. I suspect not even crowdstrike and the like could handle malicious pci devices. Well, vanguard can't either, it's just a cat and mouse game. But they are definitely trying in an area where most seem to have given up, but it's absurd that it's a fucking game anticheat that's doing this.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Vanguard is proven spyware. If you installed that shit, I'd wipe the OS and reflash the BIOS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Do you have a source of this information?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No, but it feels right and it sounds cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    It is spyware by design, but whether it's being used maliciously is still in question.

    It does send encrypted traffic to China, though, and while that alone isn't proof of nefarious behavior (could be anonymous metadata/logs for development purposes), it's extremely suspicious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    So glad I stopped playing league of legends over a decade ago. (And it wasn't even because of this, you could play it on a completely normal computer back then, I just ended up liking Dota more)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    When the arms race with cheaters has gotten there you should change strategies in fighting them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago*

    Sometimes I wonder if Vanguard is actually a government pet project for practice blocking and executing malicious pci devices.

    You take one of those pci dma cheat cards, put a modem in them, and you've broken secure boot. And nation states have done such a thing to compromise laptops or other devices after getting physical access to them for a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Has very intrusive kernel level/bios level anticheat
    still has cheaters.
    mfw

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    tfw millions of dollars of anticheat development is defeated by one PCI-E-boi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Can someone explain to me why cheating shouldn't be solely caught and prevented on the servers these games run on? Why the hell are they diving into control on my own system?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's all about control. They demand control over servers, not allowing you to self host. They also demand control over communities, by putting them all in one big server or other controlled channels (but sometimes refusing to properly moderate them like in league of legends).

    Now, they want to control your device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    You make it sound like a conspiracy to control our lives instead of a profit-maximization behavior. It's cheap and easy to lock you out and expensive to build things more robustly. The cost to your privacy, autonomy, etc. isn't passed on to them because typical consumers don't know or care what they're giving up. This is what regulations are for but it's all a little late for that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    That would require them to run more servers, any extra CPU time is an indirect cost. By moving anti cheat to the client (along with other stuff like hit detection,) then they are only spending the customers CPU time not their server CPU time.

    It's about money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    In basic terms, your computer has to say something like I clicked here, to send it to the server and orchestrate with the other clients. On the flip side the server sends stuff back that your client can show you were the other clients are. All this raw data can be used by a cheater however they want. If we minimise the data available to you or a cheater to be the levellest, that would be the client only sends mouse and keyboard inputs, and all the client gets back from the server is pre-rendered frames. Think game streaming, from a cheating perspective is the problem solved? No, they just make a program to read screen and move the mouse when it sees an enemy faster than any human can, or more realistically to avoid that detection, just act slightly better than the cheaters opponent. As other comments have mentioned, game streaming for everyone would be expensive for the server. And if your clever you'll realise that even BIOS level detection won't stop a separate computer with a webcam doing keyboard mouse emulation, hence the comments about the developers wanting control. AI deepfakes can attest that even gameplay moderation will get more difficult as the input emulation gets more human like.

    So the only hope is to do enough of all these things so that cheaters deem it not worth the effort/not profitable enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago

    and its THE anti cheat mechanism. Not just any but THE one.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    How is cheating in Valorant this profitable?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Why would a game owned by China want full control of a PC?

    Maybe cheating is the excuse because selfhosting and server mods just banning cheaters would work if they actually cared about cheating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago*

    Why would anyone want root kernel access to a PC?

    Oh, uh, to be able to read anything on the entire PC, also be able to interdict and then modify literally any ongoing process or command.

    ... Palantir is very very hungry for data, after all.

    And you can make money, if you sell it to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    In the video game 'black market', boosting/carry services and selling accounts is big business. You can hire minimum wage employees in whatever country has the cheapest labor costs, throw them in front of a PC with aimbot software and have them escort customers for US $30/hr.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago
    [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    MSI is on my shit list for the next build, then. I want full control over my machine, including the games I play. I do not want to waste time grinding for stuff, when I can be enjoying narratives instead. Plus, who knows what kind of crappy things that governments or corporations would get up to?

  • source