all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 6 months ago (12 children)

It's people who are to blame.

Instead of voting for people who profit from war, they should vote for people who profit from the universal healthcare, childcare, absence of poverty.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    To be fair to the people, it's not as if the big elections are a buffet of selection. Having to choose between light and dark meat doesn't help me if I want a salad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    What if one of the meats is doing a sig heil and stealing from kids cancer funds?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I mean yes, it should be cut and dry given the current dynamic. Picking between two options when one is crawling with maggots is a pretty easy choice but that wasn't really my point.

    Unfortunately my point matters less than I wish it did. Loads of people don't bother voting anyway, many that do vote are ill informed to some extent, and enough show up thinking they'll get big and strong by eating maggots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    The system is rigged that the only way to run in politics is to get multiple MILLIONS in donorship

    And that's just not possible except for if you do dodgy deals or are already a millionaire.

    This ends up making the choices;

    • someone who's in the back pocket of oligarchy and corporate

    Or

    • someone who's in the back pocket of oligarchy and corporate
    • and also a millionaire
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Liberals upvoting you and agreeing furiously because they voted for "most lethal military" Kamala cop city Harris will downvote this comment without reflecting on the irony.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Meanwhile, MAGA voters are agreeing as well because they voted for "definitely won't do a war, trust me" Donald cranky old fart Trump will upvote, though, also without reflecting on the irony.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I'm surprised it was upvoted TBH. Basically it was an irony highlighting the fact that the general population's well-being is not profitable and therefore is not possible within the current system. As Grigory Yudin put it, Democracy is not elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I had to look up the bridge dollar amount because I thought that was way too low. Turns out that it's very accurate.

    https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/sd2024.cfm

    We really do suck on what gets prioritized.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
    [–] 28 points 6 months ago

    Poor and POC have been yelling about this for over 100 years. We were told to get some bootstraps and to stop looking for handouts. The Pentagon can't account for 60% of its already spent money and they want another $200 billion to kill poor brown people overseas? At least if they bombed us we'd be getting to see our tax dollars in person, if even for a milliseconds. Bets slowly dying in the world's best and wealthiest nation.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    But think of the children!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Don't forget that they also always want tax cuts - especially for the rich. Trump's platform both elections have promised significant tax reductiona for personal and business taxes - and delivered (one of the few campaign promises he's kept to).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You whiners are losing sight of the big-picture, important stuff, like the unmitigated scandal where Hunter Biden once received a drink on the house.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And Obama wore a tan suit once!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Lamestream media refuses to keep America first demonism of democrat interference in Dijon mustard scandal. The midterms will still hopefully focus on the important undeniable America first accomplishment: The glorious White House ballroom, where patriots will vote their conscience on supporting the party that keeps Trump alive for 2 6 more years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Just imagine if we had health coverage that wasn't tied to our jobs. If you had enough money to live on you could -- gasp -- quit your job and couch it up or find a different one. Can't have that though, because that's too much like actual freedom.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    What's all the more ridiculous is, the US government already spends like $2-3T per year on medical spending (Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc). And that's not enough somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    See, the issue is that war is the business with the biggest margin.

    That, and the added benefit of putting all the world in a state of survival which is seldom conductive of thoughtful reflection but rather throws most people Intl mindless consumption nowadays.

    As long as they have streaming services most people will shrug off the sad and dangerous state of affairs, simply because its easier and confortable.

  • source
  • Are those figures to end those things for good or just a year?

    I agree with the sentiment just curious about the figures.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And I thought the US was a $200B damage hurricane away from debt collapse

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 months ago*

    Nah, as long as the dollar is the world's reserve currency and the government is a net positive for the bank accounts of the world's billionaires and multinational corporations, it'll be held up as per the "too big to fail" policy no matter the amount of debt.

    The moment that either or both of those things stop being true (which used to be beyond impossible, but now could be just a year or two away), it could make 1930 seem like a boom year in comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Can someone please introduce a $200b bill for some of these things at the same time Pete puts out his hand?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Funny how money shows up instantly for some things, but disappears for others 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    We could do all of that, and fix all the roads, and build high-speed rail, but no, pedophiles need more private islands and mega yachts

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    This is a really huge amount of money, FYI. Itemization of it isn't yet available until it gets to congress, but some estimates of $30B-$50B are for "regional/global needs" that are essentially repairs/reconstruction of previous capabilities now lost. If your loving congresscritters don't pay, then China will take over GCC. ROC/Japan allotments are unlikely to be prioritized, but then likely to leave US orbit. China has seriousfaced offered Taiwan peaceful reunification in exchange for some sweet LNG.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    lmao why even pay taxes when they are just wasting it

  • source
  • [+] -18 points 6 months ago (4 children)