418
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by pantherina@feddit.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 81 points 2 days ago

Man, the payment processors got bored with NSFW and they're attacking free software now?

[-] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Porn is always the canary in the coal mine when it comes to things like this and censorship.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago

They attack everybody that isn't a bootlicker

[-] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

My suspicion is that they either were pressed by government to demand that data, or they wanted to terminate contracts at fault of the client.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How much you want to bet some billionaire bought them on the down low? Because they've been working fine with this FSFE for 15 years and now all of a sudden this is something that they require? It's very suspicious.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 137 points 2 days ago

Over the past few months, our former payment provider Nexi S.p.A. (“Nexi”) requested access to private data, which we understood to be specifically the usernames and passwords of our supporters. We have refused this request. All our attempts to clarify Nexi’s request, or to understand how their need for such information was necessary and legal, were met with what we consider to be vague and unsatisfactory explanations relating to a general need for risk analysis.

Y tho. What in fuck does a payment provider have to do with asking for this?

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 75 points 2 days ago

…and passwords

Um, excuse me? For starters they should only ever have hashes, but there is never a valid reason to ask for that many passwords.

[-] Undertaker@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

Many? Not for one

[-] diablomnky666@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

Missed opportunity for them to troll Nexi and just send them:

Usernames Passwords hunter2 hunter2

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago

Is this not against GDPR? I feel like this would be a slam dunk case.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

FSFE should report them to the GDPR authority, but also financial ones.

The article says Nexi reached out after 'cancelling' the contract - meaning FSFE was financially offline for those few days. If it were a 'normal' business this was done to, they would sue for damages to hell and back.

And so should FSFE.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

How come there's never a name attached to these things.

As in a name reporting the issue, or a name from the payment provider?

It's on the FSFE homepage if you need confirmation of the story: https://fsfe.org/news/2026/news-20260316-01.en.html

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean the name of the people who are originating these ideas. We should be putting names like who are the executives.

They get away with this stuff because they're faceless organizations or higher ups beyond consequences.

I just see so many systems in place that are there to allow these things to trample us and nobody in this generation challenges. Like the opposition to authority in this generation just seems like they're apart of the authority. They're also playing they're role.

[-] pageflight@piefed.social 70 points 2 days ago
[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago

Thank you, not sure why OP didn't cross-post the original post here?

[-] pantherina@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

Because Jerboa doesnt support that and not even the Lemmy WebUI had an obvious way to do this

[-] Nickelalloy@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Now I am a monthly donor!

Thanks for sharing.

[-] pmk@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago
[-] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Yearly, but yes!

[-] x3lz@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Fuck payment processors use crypto

[-] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Considering every crypto exchange nowadays has KYC, it's not that much better.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

you can just not use them, there's still plenty of individuals willing to trade crypto for cash on decentralized marketplaces. You don't have to use the big exchanges just because they are big you know?

[-] entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

They could choose to just not use crypto and shut the fuck up…

Or..

They could lose their entire goddamn minds over nothing because they haven’t touched grass or a vagina in 45 years.

[-] parzival@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago

Retoswap, LocalMonero, and Bisq dont

[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Actually, there's still stuff like localmonero and bisq which were non-KYC when I last checked, but your point still stands.

[-] Goldenring@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Crypto is scam.

[-] DillDough@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Lmao crypto failed at it's purpose before you even knew about it. Shit is centralized and monitored, it's the exact same as any other currency.

[-] exu@feditown.com 28 points 2 days ago

For the future; Lemmy has a perfectly functional cross-post button.

[-] pantherina@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

Send a screenshot please. I never managed to do that

[-] exu@feditown.com 20 points 2 days ago

Here's how it looks in the Lemmy web ui

From this post

[-] pantherina@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago
[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That's some rice field level bullshit

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

at which shareholder's demand?

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
418 points (99.5% liked)

Open Source

45525 readers
213 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS