all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It shouldn't be invisibile in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Well, of course it depends on the type of game and context, it just sounds a bit like an uninteresting tool, to just have a just invincible NPCs. I think special weaknesses make every NPC more interesting. Give the NPC a weakness (eg. Superman hs cryptonite or Lord Voldemord has Horcruxes).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    OP said it was invincible, not that it didn't have a special weakness - you're assuming extra context that wasn't mentioned, when, as you say, the type of game, in game context, and additional conditions like a special weakness can make it entirely appropriate to have an invincible NPC.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    "Yes, I'd hate to have more awesome boss fights... WINK WINK."

  • source