of at least a half-million Americans is to argue — nonsensically — that the virus came out of the Wuhan virology lab and therefore something, something, something Trump is not responsible. He’s doing this with House Oversight Committee hearings this week.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 140 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Yes, emphatically YES!

There was a dramatic shift in tone from the Trump White House during the early COVID days once it was realized that the virus outbreak centered on urban areas.

And it was incredibly obvious to anybody paying attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    And it was also painfully obvious that once it bit into rural areas, it was going to extract even more blood.

    Trump lost GA by less votes than people who died of Covid before the election in GA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    No, he didn't "let people die".

    He actively contributed to those deaths.

    Right wing media spent the entire pandemic fighting against distancing, masks, vaccines, against science. And pretending horse dewormer was a miracle solution for everything. But it turns out reality isn't a political opinion, and millions of people died because of those lies.

    When humanity was fighting against covid, Republicans were fighting on the virus' side

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    But at the very beginning, there was one moment where they said we didn't need masks, so all of your points are refuted! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I know you're being sarcastic but I still want to punch you. So fucking sick of that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    In general, we were lucky that the epidemic wasn't something worse. Imagine the governmental failure during an Ebola pandemic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 58 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can't get over how 1.1 million Americans died and people are acting like it was bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Imagine a war causing that many deaths. There would be statues and a memorial holiday. All I got was a slightly diminished sense of smell and grandma's house.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yes. Kushner also stole medical equipment and PPE to sell it to other nations.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    His administration stole supplies meant for liberal states and gave them to conservatives.

    So, ugh , yes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago

    Yes. And he would do it again.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago

    I wouldn't say for political purposes. I'd say for lazy, ignorant narcissism-yet-inferiority-complex (call it self-loathing), mindless knee-jerk flailing with a five-seconds attention span that resets every five seconds.

    Attempt at lazy instant gratification - RESET - Attempt at lazy instant gratification - RESET - Attempt at lazy instant gratification - RESET...
    Over and over again. A million times over. Never-ending until that parasitic creature dies. With no care to the death and suffering any of this could bring to those "inferior to me"... and EVERYONE is inferior to that pig, EVERYONE will eventually be thrown under the bus. All for a five-second knee-jerkoff hollow satisfaction.

    That's not quite politics. It's something much sicker than that, if you can wrap your head around such a thing. The politics are just the fucking wallpaper on the dungeon.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago*

    When you side with Trump, you're siding with Genocide Denial.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Why is this even phrased as a question?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    A fun past time of the Trump years has been the articles and videos and such adjudicating whether or not Trump did something that usually we saw him do on TV, at a campaign rally, or through often multiple audio recordings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
    [–] 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    If somebody can be vaccinated for a serious communicable disease but refuses, they’re basically telling me that they’re an idiot, and/or they don’t really care about others (despite whatever arguments they may make to the contrary). That isn’t someone I want in my social circle.

    If someone has demonstrated that they don’t care whether I live or die, I don’t feel bad for ignoring their phone call at 2 AM.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yes. All billionaires do this every single day they don't donate the majority of their wealth.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Generous to assume he's that rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    He could certainly sell his assets if he felt the need. No one has to live in a luxury hotel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I have doubts that it even approaches 1B if he sells it all. And that is assuming he actually could sell and it's not all tied up in various money juggling maneuvers or solely his (as far as hotels, resorts, etc)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Tell that to the twice impeached former president. He not only put himself up in what he considered luxury, but he also placed the secret service in that same hotel at the tax payers expense while charging extortionate rates, just because he could.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago

    It's not even a debatable point. The fact that it's presented as such is irritating.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Yes, he did. Saved you a click.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    He did, and it cost him the election. I know more than a few people who voted for him the first time, but switched to Biden due to Trump's COVID denial.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    Its crazy that he got rid of the folks monitoring for that type of thing in like oct/nov 2019. I mean if you tried to pick a time to fuck us maximally you could not have done better.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    Short answer:Yes Long answer: Yes, Absolutely.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    This might be a hot take, but I think Trump is too dumb himself to have done this the way the article frames it. He is EMPHATICALLY responsible for the deaths of many, and for varied reasons, but he's simply not intelligent or thoughtful enough to have planned anything further than a few days ahead for political points.

    His puppet masters though... different story. I 100% believe that the massive pieces of shit surrounding him manipulated him into doing some truly horrific things that led to more deaths than needed.

    You really think a racist/classist turd like Stephen Miller didn't realize that the poor were obviously more at risk of infection and survival, and that the majority of those infected and dying would be in urban areas which largely vote Democrat? That little soulness asshat is probably more culpable for anything truly devious, like the kids in cages thing. He was gleefully laughing when asked about it the first time that was outed.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Pretty obvious Yes to the headline.

    Or as Trump said, “it is what it is.”

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›