I remember when people used to say that Rowling was different because she made her money from writing or whatever.

all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nobody earns a billion dollars through honest work. You don't become a celebrity billionaire on your own. Creating and maintaining celebrity takes a large team of workers who sees none of the profits created by the celebrity.

Those profits are most often created by being able to demand far greater prices for branded merchandise than the cost of labour and materials, justified solely by the brand and image of the celebrity. This allows them to extract a form of monopoly rent by creating an artificial scarcity in the market.

Celebrity billionaires might not be the most consciously evil billionaires but they are exploitative and parasitic, just like any other kind of billionaire.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I think especially in the digital age you could theoretically earn a billion dollars without exploiting anyone, like if you wrote an ebook or made a video game that pops off like Undertale, where there is little to no labor required for distribution. It's still unethical to hoard that much wealth and society should tax it away from you. Even if we were to accept the narrative that some billionaire celebrities made their wealth through ethical means (which they didn't), they still very much have the ability to give it to people who need it and choose not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The wealth gap between just being a millionaire and being a billionaire is so unfathomably massive.

    Millionaires are believable in a single lucky lifetime, but billions? One thousand millionaires in one person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    The Harry Potter books have sold over 600 million copies. Of course there were a lot of people involved, but I think nowadays with digital self-publishing, it could be possible to have a book series that sells millions of copies while only requiring the labor of a handful of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    There are no good billionaires. Period.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I am surprised this meme made it here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I get that now. I guess it just tire me seeing people who should be allies and friends being blind sided. I am tired of trying to explain a different perspective to friend and family, let alone strangers on the net. I mean words are wind. And yet here we are. I guess I am just ranting now. In another thread on this meme a particular stupid lemming argued there had to be good billionaires otherwise there would be no one to oppose the bad ones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Rowling made her money from stealing surplus value from people who produce the overpriced commodities based on her shitty racist wizard book, so those arguments never had much merit.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago* (6 children)

    If all she did was sell books it would be different than what she actually did which is create a massive franchise that exploits the labor of countless others. Of course if all she did was sell books then she wouldn't be a billionaire in the first place. Same thing with all the other celebrity billionaires, they wouldn't be what they are without systemic exploitation, it's just not possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    Even "just" selling books is often exploitative, the publishing mafia is predatory as fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    And, unless she edited them herself (which, considering the quality of the writing, It wouldn't surprise me), printed, bound, marketed, distributed, sold and accounted for all of them, she's not entitled to all of the proceeds of her books either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    She probably stopped having an editor pretty quickly since I can't imagine an editor letting "Kingsley Shacklebolt" slide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The biggest excuse they use nowadays is that its a billion dollars in stocks and other assets, and therefore there's nothing anyone can do. As if selling stocks is unheard of. They think we're stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago*

    They say that if they started to sell them the stock would devalue and they wouldnt get full price. But this is true for literally any asset (including raw currency!). The market doing a supply and demand doesn't mean special rules apply to them only

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    This is true of course, but at the same time I also think some billionaires deserve a bit more hate than others.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    I'm sorry. I'm old AF. Who the absolute fuck are the two clowns on the bottom? Serious question. Are those the "good billionaires?" Straight to the fucking wall, the both of them. Nobody on Earth has ever in the history of human civilization "earned" a billion dollars. The wall. Now.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    damn I'm 45 and I can immediately recognize Rihanna lol, that's impressive levels of not paying attention and I'm genuinely, non ironically jealous lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly had no idea that Rihanna is a billionaire

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
    [–] 10 points 9 months ago*

    Imagine having more money than you could ever, ever spend, and looking at the world and saying "hmm, no I got mine".

  • source