In what appears to be an escalating incursion into a user’s digital privacy, a collective of film companies continue to implore the court to compel Reddit to surrender its users’ personal details. This move is part of an ongoing piracy liability case against Internet Service Providers. Reddit, however, steadfastly resists, staunchly defending its users’ rights to anonymous speech.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 300 points 3 years ago (10 children)

Movie studios: "This is definitely the most important thing we have to deal with right now"

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 112 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Here's the plan, gentleman. Where's my cigar? Now listen up! We ain't gonna be making another movie the whole rest of duh year, see? Fuck dem writers. Don't even get me started on the talent! So here's what we do. We get the moneys from this kid dat donloided one of our movies 12 years ago. It's brilliant! Where's Harvey?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 150 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    They think that bullying one user is going to setup an example of what happens when you fuck with them.

    Fuck 'em.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    IIRC they aren't prosecuting these users, instead they want to make them be witnesses in a case against an ISP they want to say wasn't doing enough to stop piracy. The Reddit posts were about whether the ISP takes action against pirates or something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 117 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children)

    Its a surprise to me that a reddit post or any kind of random text blurb can be used as an admission of anything. What if the guy simply says I made all that up for fun? There is no requirement for text written on the internet to be under oath. Edit: fixed spelling oauth -> oath ;)

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 103 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Wait a minute. Are you saying people can lie on the internet?

    This changes everything!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 113 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    The film companies have singled out a Reddit user, “xBROKEx,” citing a 12-year-old comment admitting to pirating the movie The Expendables.

    Reddit counters that this attempted breach of privacy is unwarranted, given that the statute of limitations for copyright infringement is just three years.

    How ridiculous. Someone admitted / bragged / bullshitted on the Internet 12 years ago. The statute of limitations expired 9 years ago. But, the film companies are still trying to get the information on a poor xBROKEx.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Could the selection be intentional? A silly unenforceable case to open the door for a more comprehensive invasion of privacy on platforms to make discussion and hosting discussion of piracy into a riskier endeavor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 109 points 3 years ago* (17 children)

    This is fucking pathetic.

    I, too, downloaded movies 12 years ago. Fuckin losers. I also used Napster, come at me.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I did the most egregious thing back in the day and rented DVDs from the video store, ripped them, then returned them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 64 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Reddit understands it's value is in content to sell. If reddit starts ratting out it's free content creators, they lose value. Their actions are a profit calculation, not some noble stand to protect privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    You’d think they’d have considered that these past few months in relation to, …other user concerns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    You are the product, not the paying customer. That means you are cattle.

    The farmer will build a fence to protect the cattle from predators, because it is in the interest of the farmer to preserve the cattle. But come payday, the farmer will gladly butcher the cattle for profit.

    Social media users in the you-are-the-product buisness model are no different. Your user experience will be catered to you to cultivate the user base. But your experience will be actively ruined the instant it benefits the paying customer, I.e. if that means the paying customer, advertisers, will get what they want (promotion).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 62 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    How are they gonna prove he really did and he's not just bluffing?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I confess. I was the 2nd gunman on the grassy knoll.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 3 years ago (33 children)

    ive pirated 99.99% of the movies ive seen come find me xD

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (23 children)

    Wait, is it even possible to pay for movies outside of a movie theater?? I have taught everyone I know how to use bittorrent because I assumed that was a basic computer literacy thing. My grandma regularly pirates TV shows so they have something to watch at her adult daycare. That old bitch even offers DVD copies for a buck fifty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (23 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Maybe I'm missing context, but the article doesn't mention what this admission looked like. Was it just a use saying "yeah I downloaded the new ghostbusters movie, it sucked glad I didn't pay for it", or was it someone admitting to camming/distributing/facilitating piracy at a base level? Surely they are not going after someone for just casually mentioning they pirated a movie?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago

    You're talking about the people that sued a single mother for millions because she uploaded a video of her child with a Beyonce song faintly in the background. These people are psychopaths.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Yeah it's not that I think they're above this kind of petty bullshit, but I don't get why they'd go "fuck this guy in particular".

    That said, even if the guy admitted to running the world's biggest pirate ring, screw them anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Friendly reminder that piracy is not theft

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 years ago

    Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum, 17 lawyers up that pirate's poor bum!

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 3 years ago

    Statute of limitations much?

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Every day that does by and /r/piracy isn’t shuttered is a surprise

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 years ago

    The only party that wins is the law firm charging as many billable hours as possible.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I admit pirating all what I need during the last 20 years... So what, they may want to jail me for that !?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I could say that I took a dump on Joe Bidens face while he soundly slept 12 years ago doesn't mean I actually did it. ;) ;)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    What do they even have to gain from this? Going after small fry individuals worked out so well for their image in the early 2000s.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago

    Admit to downloading a car and you on a list forever.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    what proof do they actually have it occurred though? 12 years is a long time - I dont think I have any electronics that are 12 years old, let alone digital media

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Shit, I wonder how long until they come for me too? I’ve pirated hundreds of movies.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›