Developers of apps that use end-to-end encryption to protect private communications could be considered hostile actors in the UK.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 246 points 9 months ago* (15 children)

Remember how, before the internet, intelligence agencies by default didn't know what anyone was saying to anyone else face to face or by mail, and had to actually work to find out? The country didn't fall apart. Why is the standard now that everything must be handed to them on a plate? Did they just get lazy?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

    I'm not disagreeing with you but what would happen back then is that they simply wouldn't stop the crime.

    At some point we need to decide if giving up all semblance of personal privacy is worth stopping some of that. I vote no enthusiastically. We just have to accept that some of that crime won't be stopped and law enforcement will have to work harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    If our countries could stop doing things that give people a reason to commit terroristic acts, Maybe that would solve some of it and we could be more secure in our papers and possessions without unlawful interference and undue search and seizures but that’s apparently none of my business

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago

    You'll love this!

    I deployed an open-source chat system at work, just for convenience. Boss was concerned that it didn't do any logging and we couldn't tell who said what.

    "You don't have any records of what we say verbally. What's the difference?"

    "...Oh. Well, you're right."

    He was coming from a legit concern. We didn't point fingers when someone screwed up, zero blame, but we needed to know exactly what happened so we could fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    That they can is what has changed. They didn't have sufficient information to put pressure.

    They still had microphones and inquiry drugs, including those causing memory loss. So they knew plenty of what people were saying to each other.

    Anyway. Everything has changed a lot, not just technology, and one can't really make a chain of causation to all this. There are plenty of feedback loops.

    The rules now are "we are stronger, so we are forbidding everything we don't want". Losing leverage does that.

    Until you learn of some way to hit them back, such questions are no good, because not answering them doesn't cost anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think its a mixture of lazy and inexperience.

    I believe if someone in a position of authority who understands how vital E2EE is in order for the internet to work, this suggestion wouldn't even be on the table.

    its a case of just kicking destroying E2EE down the road for another generation to deal with, I believe. not sure what the solution is, either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    They cut costs by firing the people doing the legwork and passed the savings along to billionaires who promised sustainable models. Now they can't hire people to do real legwork anymore because, "no one wants to work anymore for their grandparents' wage in an economy and society designed to turn people into voluntary slaves and the only way to escape is to become homeless and go off the grid, but the laws are being molded to prevent anyone from escaping the system."

    I'm pretty sure that's how the old adage goes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 87 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Said proudly by the hostile actors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 85 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Wow, the UK sounds like an awful place.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I thought we were unique in this but frankly everywhere in the "western" world is talking about the same things. EU has chat control, Australia has similar efforts, USA aren't pushing for privacy at all so it's not a uniquely British problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 59 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Folks, "1984" was supposed to be a warning. Not an instruction manual, with check off items.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    What the fuck happened to the UK? Is Trump president there too?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 53 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pervasive surveillance is a hostile act. Abetting genocide and other crimes against humanity is a hostile act. Serving the rich at the expense of the poor is a hostile act.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 50 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    What the heck is happening with Europe in general? I thought they were better in terms of maintaining individual privacy, damm.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    That's europe, this is just UK. Brexit didn't work out in a lot of ways they planned

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 9 months ago

    Boys... When it's considered a hostle act to demand rights, ownership, and privacy... We have a problem.

    I'm reminded of a particular movies speech...

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 9 months ago

    Well many governments see their citizens as hostile actors, so its not really a change, is it?

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 9 months ago

    And i think committing and/or assisting in genocides is 'hostile activity'. One of us is definitely wrong :)

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago

    If you don’t want your citizens to be hostile, don’t make yourself an enemy.

  • source
  • [+] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 9 months ago

    Welcome to New East Germany.

  • source
  • [+] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I'm baffled that all this tracking nonsense is pushed through by a government that is supposed to be left of the tories. I guess that goes to show you that "center" parties can be just as evil as conservatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    They aren't left. Starmer and chums undermined the left-wing leader of Labour. They're the pro-business wing of the party. New Labour folks were always dreadful for this sort of thing. Many authoritarian changes are coming from the centre, in UK, France, Denmark etc.

    It all feels co-ordinated as states and their representatives squeeze down on working people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Don’t y’all vote over there? Government isn’t us vs them. Government is us. Period.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 9 months ago

    PGP has been around since the 90's can you PLEASE shut the fuck up.

    Like please.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Gosh, and these powers could be handed to Farage.

    They could be complicit in what comes next.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Doesn't even RCS and iMessages use E2EE?

    I think most messaging apps these days have it. Allegedly even Discord (calls only, not text chat) has it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think part of this is lawmakers not understanding the gravity of what they’re suggesting. Besides, most of these apps have some sort of backdoor built-in so they can decrypt messages if required in legal proceedings. Ripping E2EE out of everything is an insane assertion to make, and would make the Internet an even more dangerous place than it already is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    These guys are so fucking stupid. Security and privacy goes both ways. Either for people to use or not. If you don't want encryption, fine, your online banking doesn't work anymore

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    What the fuck happened to UK, I knew their average population was dumb when brexit happened but they doubled down on it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago

    People ran so hard from the Tories that they didn't consider Blue Labour would be dreadful also. Right now Labour and Tories are politically in danger and Reform and the Green Party are surging. Folk are fed up of parties not representing them. They just haven't fully cottoned on that that also applies to Reform. Greens are probably the main hope right now. Membership trebled to 180k. Polling close to Labour.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    Let's be hostile together then

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Stamer is running a social experiment, see how many people worldwide can hate him in the least amount of time possible. Everything he and his goons do is double down constantly on shit nobody wants.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›