top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 185 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I was wondering where the US was. Then I scrolled to the right.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Life expectancy as a function of spending is parabolic confirmed? New theory: if you spend more than $22,000 on healthcare per capita, life expectancy will be negative

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 99 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Take this as a warning, UK.

    Your NHS will get even fucking worse and cost three and a half times as much, and somehow a large portion of you stupid fucks are clamoring for US style private insurance rather than making the fucking Tories do their job.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    Unfortunately, in case you're unfamiliar with UK politics, making life as miserable as possible is the whole government's thing at the moment and the majority don't support them. Please do not call us stupid fucks though, we are their victims, perhaps figure out how to send help, get us invaded, anything to get rid of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Only Denmark has a Beveridge funding model. Most of the places at the top of the chart have a social insurance model (Bismarck).

    Ultimately whatever the model, the UK has really low capital investment which is starting to show severely now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago

    Take this with a grain of salt. For example sweden spends much more on healthcare than spain but they achieve the same in life expectancy because swedish doctors get payed more and sweden is in the north where there are other problems to deal with(mental health) and people generally live shorter lives. The us is fucked up no matter how you look at it.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    A life expectancy almost as high as China and we only had to spend 13 times the amount of money.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I knew it was bad in the US. I did not know it is THAT bad.

    Lots of profits to protect. The lobbying must be intense. Total shitshow.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The lobbying must be intense.

    The Sackler family, the shitbags most directly responsible for the opioid epidemic in the US, were handed a sweetheart settlement deal where they had to hand over a small percentage of their multi-billion dollar fortunes and in return they were SHIELDED FROM PROSECUTION on any related charges or civil suits.

    Luckily even our shitbag Supreme Court could see what utter scumfuck horseshit that was and tossed the deal out the window and into a garbage bin where it belonged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Looking like the Japanese have it dialed in, eh?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Not to lump it in South Korea, but Koreans stay active and going out for many more years than other countries.

    While the healthcare is good, I'm sure the "not staying at home" is better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    And yet this, too, is driven by terrible political decisions that practically force Americans to drive even the shortest distances. As a European, your cities and towns are extremely aggressive towards pedestrians and cyclists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Is this data old? India's life expectancy is now 70+ according to World Bank. Eithercase, I am impressed by China. They had a life expectancy of ~36 years in 1949 when PRC was established. They lagged behind both India and Pakistan for quite some time(cough Mao cough) but then took such a steep climb upwards.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 14 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • [–] [S] 35 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Expenditure on health gives a measure of the final consumption of health goods and services (i.e. current health expenditure). This includes spending by all types of financing arrangements (such as government-based programmes, social insurance and out-of-pocket spending) on medical services and goods, population health and prevention programmes, as well as administration of the health system.

    OECD, Health at a Glance 2021

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    But privatization makes everything cheaper and more efficient morshupls

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    American Exceptionalism

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What're they doing in Costa Rica?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    Cuba's life expectancy is too high and their expenditure too low to fit on the graph, very funny shit

    Also USA is way higher than 12k a year, what was this from, 20 years ago? Last I saw was like 28k

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I feel like if this was on Reddit there would be people commenting "Based USA".

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    To separate the effect of demographic differences from the expenditure, might help to divide by an age-weighted population, rather than simply per capita. Also, is this expenditure converted to US$ in MER or PPP (for services the latter makes more sense)?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Would the graph look slight more narrow if we accounted for median or average country income? Me spending 12k dollars a year in the us is very different than in Mexico, depending on where I get me income from.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As a South African.. damn..

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Thailand on NHSO: Whatever, just take this paracetamol and shut up. NEXT.

    Thailand on Social Security: $25 per month per person forever. Oh, it doesn't cover mental health or Risperidone or whatever. NEXT.

    Thailand on Govt Officer (NOT Govt Employee) Healthcare: How may I be of assistance today milord?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is not a fair comparison. The American medical system has to keep Americans alive while the Spanish medical system merely has to keep Spaniards alive. It is a medical miracle that Americans get to live above the age of 70 on average with their lifestyles.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Same with Italy. The national health-care system barely works, but you know what they say about the Italian lifestyle...

    Also, lol I didn't even noticed USA was there before your comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    If you want hookers and cocaine you join the USA health insurance corporations

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›