all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yay! I hope they figure out a way around the no-sideloading BS too

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i would have thought it would be oneplus, but theyve recently made bootload unlocking more restrictive, unless theyre walking back on that for graphene

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Samsung phones are probably a no-go though, right? No way around their locked bootloader?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The phone would be shipping with GrapheneOS, you don't need to unlock the bootloader if you are the OEM installing the OS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The project explained that only Pixels have met its strict security and update requirements so far.

    Have they explained before what these requirements are?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean good for them for finally pulling their head outta their ass but this is again for rich people only. y'all who don't got no bricks of cash to spend on new & shiny slabs of glass - get fucked as usual.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Eh not really, in India you can get a 2nd hand Pixel "a" model a couple years old and have it last for nearly a decade with official support and GrapheneOS extended support, not bad value for money but certainly a bit more expensive than the most budget phones.

  • source
  • parent