all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 11 months ago (9 children)

op: searches "lemmy"

few seconds later: "wow, al results are about lemmy"

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    I mean it's interesting that it has surpassed Kilmister as the top result in some regions/contexts and is definitely more numerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Neat

    I wonder how Google (and the search engines that depend on Google) decide which person/entity to feature in the snippet. At what point would Lemmy the software replace Lemmy the person?

    For example, "Swift" brings up the financial organization, while "Taylor" brings up Taylor Swift

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    You're still using google? Ew. People like you make me lose hope.

    ;P

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Eh, ill go there if duckduck doesnt find what im looking for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Duckduck is just a wrapper for bing (and gives microsoft trackers a free pass)

    Startpage is a similar thing that uses google. Considering how hated bing is believe Duck only got more popular because of privacy marketing.

    The safest alternative is running your own searxng client, it still relies on bing and google but at least you can verify that its actually stopping all trackers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    How about i just wont search.

    Honestly though, I barely do. Maybe for work, but I dont think setting up my own will be as helpful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago*

    I regret not including this as an option now but I contemplated adding this part:

    The majority of our (subjective-my) internet nowadays follows patterns of the same places, new places are often found on the old places.

    Most of my sites are bookmarked trusted websites. (Increasingly more self hosted also) wikipedia for facts, wolfram alpha for math, sites i have an account on.

    Part of the crux is when is the last time you googled in the hope to find a new website you don’t already know yet? Even ads direct you using QR.

    I find i rarely need a search engine anymore and when often when i do i can’t find anything anyway. Stuff has gotten so buried under search engine optimisation you are better of using ai for a first responds to obtain the terminology to search for how wrong ai got it then by searching for a question directly.

    I am hoping to try this thing soon and if its good it might replace 90% of my browser activity. -> https://github.com/glanceapp/glance

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    So, do we have to explain how Google search results work?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Actually how does Lemmy and the Fediverse even work for search engines with regard to duplication? Do each instance only show posts from communities which are moderated on the instance, and dynamically show a robots.txt to ignore federated communities? Or since posts federate, does each instance a post federates to show up in search results? I could see the latter being really annoying to someone who doesn't understand what's going on, and keeps getting results for the same exact post, although would be nice to have a replacement for adding site:reddit.com to some search results.

  • source