top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 153 points 11 months ago* (18 children)

Hey he's not a terrorist! He's a war criminal and a genocider. Please.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    He is absolutely a terrorist also. He fits every definition of one.

    Side point but where does this "one-upper" tendency come from? Just let people describe things in terms that make sense to them. This isn't twitter, there's no reason to contradict them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I would think that genocide is some order of magnitude worse than terrorist (which is obviously very shitty to begin with), so I would like to make it clear that Bibi is somewhere at the top of my personal ranking of shit people.

    But terrorist is fine (if I may say so), too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    He is responsible for a genocide in Gaza and possibly in the West Bank but also a terrorist in the other countries they are attacking like the pager attacks that killed children and other innocents in collateral damage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, blowing up aid vans and air striking refugee encampments is pretty terrorist-y

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Fair enough. Terrorist and war criminal and genocidist then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 10 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    It is just different levels of specificity really. I found the meme and didn't think to edit it. I think terrorist would be applicable especially for the pager attack, Doha strike on negotiators, attacks of Iranian scientists, etc. Maybe you should look up the Mossad use of terrorism if you are not aware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Hey, hey, hey... That's fucked up; you can't just call someone a 'genocider' lile thaf...

    It's genocid*-ist*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    america when it sees a terrorist:

    Stock photo of a white man looking at himself in a mirror

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Netanyahu claimed foreign leaders who “public condemn us privately thank us. They tell me how much they value Israel’s superb intelligence services that have prevented, time and again, terrorist attacks in their capitals.” He did not say which countries’ leaders had privately thanked him.

    “So Benjamin, are those leaders in the room with us right now?”

    Even the US pulled their senior diplomats who’d normally be there and sent the interns instead lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    He's not trying to say that their Intel service has helped. He's trying to emphasize "privacy" and "Israeli intelligence service" to remind people that Mossad has dirt on them, without literally saying that, imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 98 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Mass UN walkout when Netanyahu started speaking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It took them a really long time to realize. I remember getting ridiculed by dems last year for criticizing Israel.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    Where is that parody video of the top event where they announce Netanyahu as a baby killer

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    That's a fascist.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    What am I looking at?

    I assume the one on top is when we did a ceremony honoring that actual SS nazi a while back, but what's the second one?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (13 children)

    I’m not yet ready to cede the term “American” to those who would support genocide.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I use USAmerican to differentiate it from the rest of the American nations.

    AmeriKKKan is also acceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    USA has a horrible history of genocide and disruption and imperialism and all that of course—still have found “AmeriKKKa” to be cringe for some reason IDK why

    Maybe cuz folks who’ve used it haven’t been eloquent or something? Seriously not sure here, again USA has committed countless crimes and def has Ku Klux Klan in its history

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    That's not all Americans just the people they pay to represent them. Also I think the other half remained seated, or refused to show up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›