all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 1 year ago

That’s good

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    At first I was like "hey where's the coal?" and for once, I was pleasantly surprised.

    Hopefully we can make a smooth transition off gas and make it vastly renewable.

    Great news.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And the cost of electricity is pinned to the price of the most expensive fuel, which is gas.

    Lame.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So why do we need more nuclear then?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How far off of this being normal are we?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    20% of last year we were below 100g/kWh. That was up from 14.5% the year before. So, every year it's becoming more and more common.

    The 2030 target is to be below that level averaged over the year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's not that uncommon. Last year we were below 100g/kWh (the 2030 target) for about 20% of the time. We averaged 83g today.

    Chart from mygridgb.co.uk

    Look over the last 12 months and you'll see renewables are 30% over the year. 30% Gas, 15% Nuclear and 10% Biomass. The rest is imported from France (mostly Nuclear) and Norway (Hydro).

    This year should see another 3GW of wind start up at Dogger Bank, with similar amount scheduled for the next couple of years. This will be more and more common.

  • source
  • parent