It's almost as if people think systemd is one massive executable rather than a suite of tools
post
I like systemd
Awaiting the guillotine...
You're not alone. For most of my career, I've only used Linux to develop software and deploy that software to production. That usually means webservers, databases, iptables/netfilter, and all the other backend processes that glue that together.
Before systemd, I was using sysVInit. Let me say that systemd has been head-and-shoulders above the previous experience in a variety of ways, with a host of built-in features:
- Predictable start-up order of processes
- Configurable inter-process dependencies (for the above)
- Restart on fail
- PID management
- Socket management
- Standard config format (no more copy-pasta init scripts)
- Clearly defined filesystem areas for package managed and user-managed services
- Clearly defined layering of config areas (e.g.
systemctl status <service>shows you exactly what files are loaded) - Solid CLI experience that provides detailed information about every managed service
Bottom line: it's dead simple to add your own stuff, and just as simple to read what packaged software is doing. I also think that using a CLI (instead of poking around /var/run and ps output) is a step up in terms of system administration, given how complex all this can get.
My only contention is the forced use of journald, where my preference would be to use the standard /var/log paradigm for all this, rather than have a doorman to a binary logging database. You can configure it to emit text logs, but that's not the system of record for logging - just a feed.
All that said, container-based solutions have rendered both init systems irrelevant a lot of the time, with tools like Kubernetes providing just about all of the same features. Moreover, cloud solutions tend to lean into cloud-init for host startup configuration and management anyway.
Yay another thread where a bunch of script kiddies running a homelab come shitting on a toolset that saved the professionals from the init mess. But they of course know that systemd is bloated and prefer running their node servers in dokker containers on something more lightweight
Are you talking about another thread? Because this one seems like the opposite
This, so much this. Although it's equally old grumpy farts as well as script kiddies. You'll be able to identify the former by their trademark quote "Systemd is the end of / nail in the coffin for Linux".
I still stand by my assumption that anyone complaining about systemd has never tried to configure SysVInit scripts before
Been using Linux as my main system for about 8 years now. I know nothing but systemd. I have never tried other init systems, so I genuinely don't know what I'm missing out on (if there is any). I don't mind systemd and I really really like services and timers. I use them all the time to automate things, but that doesn't mean I don't hate some things about systemd. One of the things that I'd love to burn to charcoal is that "a stop job for UID 1000..... 1:45 minutes", bitch? I don't have that much time on my hands, reboot right now. What are the things that other init systems have that make them better than systemd?
a stop job for UID 1000..... 1:45 minutes
oh oh and then it changes to 3 minutes something when 1:45 passes! where was that configured mr poettering??
Honestly buttctl has some nice features once you get used to it.
"It is I. Everything."
I've always liked systemd.
I'm learning FreeBSD and the training wheels are off having to learn RC. I should've done this years ago.
On that, anyone know how to pull core temps off a 20 year old Celeron D in OpenBSD? That and my internal PC speaker are the only things I don't have working yet.

top 50 comments