top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I swear people that don't watch trek think it's just about lasers and technobabble.

I know people that refused to watch Discovery because 'they made it all woke and now it's all about women'.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    I do have issues with the fact modern Trek when they do things like put Elon Musk into dialogue alongside Zephrym Cochran and the Wright Brothers, or when they put the Jan6 riots into a video montage about the failures of humanity. It immediately dates the show in a way that 90s trek never felt dated, and it assumes it knows how people in the future will feel about today's events. Look at how well the Musk reference has aged.

    I'm not saying you can't reference current social issues and make a statement on them, I'm just saying that if you make the smallest effort to use allegory, even if it's obvious, it will age better than literally showing modern footage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Luckily, the Musk thing can be handwaved by the fact that it was Mirror Lorca saying it. Maybe over there, he was a good guy?

    Otherwise, agreed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    I don't know the exact context but Thomas Edison was a cutthroat businessman yet people still reference him alongside the Wright brothers. Same for Henry Ford and Walt Disney.

    The fact Elon is not an inventor at all, at best a visionary investor, seems more at odds with the other names.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (8 children)

    Discovery has problems (I still like that show), but being woke it not one of them...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This. I don't watch Discovery anymore because I couldn't stand a lot of the characters but it had absolute nothing to do with progressive views.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I refused to watch it because I couldn't stand the main character tbh. For someone who was supposed to be in what is essentially the space navy, michael sure was an insubordinate POS. Maybe it got better but I couldn't sit through more than 2 episodes.

    Honestly the disrespect for the command structure shown in a lot new trek stuff is why I have such a hard time watching it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Don't get me wrong, I was furious with Michael almost the whole way through!

    I think they were trying to tell us the story of someone that struggled with starfleet principles but ends up finding their way and becoming a great captain, but she just pissed the fans off.

    She did get a bit better, I now give her a pass because she told her boyfriend that if starfleet told her to she would just kill him.

    She's still the least suitable captain of any show though, in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    Since the beginning!

  • source
  • [+] 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Not to mention, it featured the first interracial kiss on television.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm sure they also watch Starship Troopers and completely miss the fact that it's a satire.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's also the problem with any kind of forum that satirizes conservatives on the internet: sooner or later, it will get flooded with right wingers who completely fail to understand that they're being made fun of, and who will start posting the satirized content in all seriousness.

    Eventually, the original people who started the venue leave, and what's left is just another right-wing echo chamber.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Star Trek has been utopian space communism from the very beginning.

    Science fiction has always been a vehicle for exploring woke ideas. Separating an issue from its current context allows the audience to set aside their biases and look with fresh eyes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    ‘Make It So’: ‘Star Trek’ and Its Debt to Revolutionary Socialism

    Beginning in 1966, the plot of “Star Trek” closely followed Posadas’s propositions. After a nuclear third world war (which Posadas also believed would lead to socialist revolution), Vulcan aliens visit Earth, welcoming them into a galactic federation and delivering replicator technology that would abolish scarcity. Humans soon unify as a species, formally abolishing money and all hierarchies of race, gender and class.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    This and the wooosh with RATM's music, have me thinking a lot of people experience media differently than I do. Just a series of unrelated pictures or sounds that make a feeling. These themes seem core to the show and presented fairly directly. Or I maybe watch too much TV and need to get outside more :)

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I've got a friend that fast forwards through films and only plays the parts with fight scenes, car chases or explosions then he will tell people the film is shit if there's not enough of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Yes, when - let's ask @georgetakei

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Two things happened:

    1. culture wars are at an all time high due to right wing lies and attempts to push everyone not like them back into a culture of fear and hiding. So they are more sensitive to stuff they would not have batted an eye over before.

    2. stories no longer have men controlling everything and having all the authority/adventures

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Also what happened is that things that where highly political and controversial at the time are now "normal" and so conservatives don't see them as political anymore because the Overton window have shifted (for the most part), so now they attack the new "unthinkable" progressive "agendas".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Kind of like how TOS was almost flagrantly progressive at the time, with women not only being equals on the bridge, but being allowed to wear what they wanted, like miniskirts, without having to dress like the men, but today, it's seen as an artefact of the times, and as a sign of the comparatively regressive attitudes of the day, rather than the feminist icon it was when the show aired.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Star Trek was so ahead of its time

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›