top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 67 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

For reference, the "Hopeless Dipshit Percentage" in any population is about 25-33%.

About a quarter to a third of the population believes in witches, ghosts and ESP; that the earth revolves around the sun; that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11; that Obama was born in Kenya; and that evolution and climate change are hoaxes. A third of the US population can't name a single right guaranteed by the constitution or even one branch of government. And a quarter of the population self-professes that they wouldn't stop supporting Trump no matter what he did.

In that context, only 3% willing to pay any money for AI is an utter failure. The LLM bubble needs to burst yesterday, and the whole Internet needs to roll back to 2022.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    @salacious_coaster @dgerard Wait till you learn the percentage of ostensibly fully functional adults that have an Invisible Friend in the Sky

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    they look forward to turning chatbots into a sea of spam:

    We expect rapid adoption of advertising models, transaction fees, affiliate revenue, and marketplace models.

    We're doomed.

    In the last weeks Pinterest became unusable imo. The AI "sea of spam" is no joke. 7 in 10 posts are ads now. AI ads. Every one of them is a grotesque AI mimic of the content you're viewing, all words meaningless gibberish. The things on the thumbnails suggest, but you can't make things really out by just seeing the thumbnails.

    So i clicked them a few times too much. First by curiosity, then by mistake, because Pinterest does everything to make an ad look like a post.

    7 in 10 posts.

    After all these years successfully procrastinating with Pinterest, it has become a dopamine blocking experience.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    @kamenlady @dgerard i knew the guys who started Pinterest. My account is literally like one of the first 10 public accounts. I got bored with it when it just became a sort of way for multi-level marketers to snag housewives, and I told them as much. But I'm surprised they allow AI slop on it. Genuine creativity and inspiration is why they really started it. Tote was pretty slick for that. It's sad what it's turned into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is there a platform that is where pinterrst used to be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    @Squizzy We Heart It, was founded by a former Pinterest engineer, but I don't know if it's still around. Many early Pinterest engineers went off and started similar projects after after the "the boys" made it more ad infested because they got greedy and Ben used to do marketing at google. So...they're not nice people anymore. But I know a few early employees started similar things.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Completely unrelated fact, but isn't the prevalence of cocaine use among U. S. adults considered to be more than 1% as well?

    (Referring to this, of course - especially the last part: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/05/generative-ai-runs-on-gambling-addiction-just-one-more-prompt-bro/)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The management regrets to inform the TechTakes/awful.systems community that this post has apparently escaped containment. In order to continue providing the environment that this community deserves, we will be distributing free tickets to the egress in response to comments that exhaust our patience.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Seems a lot to be honest.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They are going to make it sub service to kill off the poor people from living with society.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    let me guess 3% are the corporate heads, c-suites, mba, and the people either implementing it or deploying it.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    This shit is not Artifical Intellegence. It's an internet scrabbing software that understands your input then searches and summerizes the answer back to you in your language....AND so many times it makes mistakes while trying to even do that. 0 intellegence, 0 creativety, 0 feelings/empathy/sympathy , 0 everythign. In programming, it's like a computer-science intern on methamphadmines. he's searching stackoverflow and githubs repos for any question you have, but again he will never come up with a new geniuos unseen before scripts of programming and he may make mistakes.

    Also, it brainrotted the skill of learning itself to kids and killed our interactions and creativity

  • source
  • epic

    Enshittify faster pls

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I’ve used it here and there for recipe inspiration based on what’s in my cupboard, but really don’t see any other use for it my life. I would drop it in an instant if it became chargeable because it’s pretty shit at most things otherwise.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    That is known & not a problem for the megacorps.

    They are building an environment where using AI will be a must (like smartphones that spy on you have become today).

    At that point it becomes overpriced & will under-deliver (the monopolistic enshitification of an already shitty offer).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›